G
GermaniaIncelia
incel vortex
-
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2020
- Posts
- 2,664
The intelligence quotient is supposed to serve as an indicative number for general intelligence used for problem solving compared to the average of a selected reference group. But general intelligence of different reference groups can not and should not always be compared with one another as if their numbers were indicative of the same meaning.
I'll explain.
Let's assume for every decision in your life you flipped a coin to make your choice and that one side of the coin represented the obviously wrong choices while the other the obviously right choices. We'll define the 'right' choices here as those choices who lead to the better sum of health and financial outcomes for you and the people around you in comparison to the outcomes of the wrong or you could more appropriately also say worse choices. On average and all the more the larger the sample size of decisions becomes, you would approximately get half of your decisions right and half of them wrong. And in this scenario, where you merely leave your decisions to dumb luck, not even to some form of intelligence, you would still be correct 50% of the time. Now if you handed these same issues to a woman, her choices would be wrong almost all of the time. The reason for why that is is irrelevant here, it could be because the woman is stupid or it could be because making wrong choices is just her nature, that's not the point of discussion here. But the point is that the woman as a sex when faced with problems to solve has something that makes her inclination for intentionally picked bad choices extremely high in frequency.
You would be far more often correct in your decisions by throwing coins to solve problems than a woman would if you let her choose based on her judgement ability.
Women can reach high IQ numbers, but their choices in problem solving are contradictory to what the metric is supposed to represent, which is the ability to solve the problems. Not to make them worse. When faced with this truth, it becomes evident quite quickly that the IQ for women is not to be interpreted the same way as for men. And that, in fact, the IQ for women shows the inverse ability to solve problems. As the more intelligence a woman has at her disposal to solve problems with, the more of that capacity she will use fully intentionally to make the problem worse. This could also partly explain why the smarts of women are inversely proportional to their fertility.
Every point of IQ a foid has, she uses not to solve problems, but to create them.
I'll explain.
Let's assume for every decision in your life you flipped a coin to make your choice and that one side of the coin represented the obviously wrong choices while the other the obviously right choices. We'll define the 'right' choices here as those choices who lead to the better sum of health and financial outcomes for you and the people around you in comparison to the outcomes of the wrong or you could more appropriately also say worse choices. On average and all the more the larger the sample size of decisions becomes, you would approximately get half of your decisions right and half of them wrong. And in this scenario, where you merely leave your decisions to dumb luck, not even to some form of intelligence, you would still be correct 50% of the time. Now if you handed these same issues to a woman, her choices would be wrong almost all of the time. The reason for why that is is irrelevant here, it could be because the woman is stupid or it could be because making wrong choices is just her nature, that's not the point of discussion here. But the point is that the woman as a sex when faced with problems to solve has something that makes her inclination for intentionally picked bad choices extremely high in frequency.
You would be far more often correct in your decisions by throwing coins to solve problems than a woman would if you let her choose based on her judgement ability.
Women can reach high IQ numbers, but their choices in problem solving are contradictory to what the metric is supposed to represent, which is the ability to solve the problems. Not to make them worse. When faced with this truth, it becomes evident quite quickly that the IQ for women is not to be interpreted the same way as for men. And that, in fact, the IQ for women shows the inverse ability to solve problems. As the more intelligence a woman has at her disposal to solve problems with, the more of that capacity she will use fully intentionally to make the problem worse. This could also partly explain why the smarts of women are inversely proportional to their fertility.
Every point of IQ a foid has, she uses not to solve problems, but to create them.
Last edited: