Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Unattractive women more likely to be married

Balding Subhuman

Balding Subhuman

If you're ugly, women want you dead
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 4, 2021
Posts
8,578
The existence of femcels once again debunked (water wet)

The analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) shows that very unattractive women were significantly more likely to be married at Age 29 than unattractive or average-looking women, and their spouses or partners earned significantly more than those of unattractive or average-looking women.

The authors concluded that 'very unattractive' women were more likely to be married or cohabitating then merely unattractive or even average to good looking women, and their spouses tended to earn more then their better-looking female counterparts. They infer that intelligent men have a preference to marry or mate with very unattractive women.


Kinda reminds me of Sam Bankman Friedman and his gf.

But this is just more proof that a woman's looks don't really play a part in whether she's capable of finding a partner.

Meanwhile: Being unattractive reduces men's chances of finding partners, but not women's


  • For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.
  • For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring.
  • Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. The results for women indicate that attractiveness did not matter.
Literally everything we've been told about how looks affect you is a lie. We are constantly told that ugly women have it the worst and that being unattractive as a man isn't a hurdle at all. Meanwhile the truth is the opposite.
 
1700306137674
 
Femcel: "No Chad, so I'm just gonna LDAR."
 
It feels boring to have all the data on our side, but still be considered the wrong lunatic ones...

Clown World indeed...
 
juggernaut law

i worked with women who looked like the goblin of 300, unkept discord mods with rage issues,women with a goatee, obese,full of chronic issues,in debt up to their eyes, you name it..
the male version of them would get refused by street hookers
all of them were married

some guys just marry the first thing that consents
 
juggernaut law

i worked with women who looked like the goblin of 300, unkept discord mods with rage issues,women with a goatee, obese,full of chronic issues,in debt up to their eyes, you name it..
the male version of them would get refused by street hookers
all of them were married

some guys just marry the first thing that consents
Yeah and it goes even beyond physical. Women with autism, schizophrenia, personality disorders, debt, childishness.. as a woman these things barely matter.

Maybe as a man with psychopathy you'd mog a psychopath woman. Women just have it so easy
 
It feels boring to have all the data on our side, but still be considered the wrong lunatic ones...

Clown World indeed...
Lmao this
No matter how many times we provide the data made by well reputed sources they just deny us.
Bluepillers can't just handle reality.
 
I wish all men became standardcels like me. Higher Male Standards = Beckies being put in their place.
 
They're more likely to be in relationships too all the ugly foids I knew were in one some are married now too
 
The existence of femcels once again debunked (water wet)

The analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) shows that very unattractive women were significantly more likely to be married at Age 29 than unattractive or average-looking women, and their spouses or partners earned significantly more than those of unattractive or average-looking women.

The authors concluded that 'very unattractive' women were more likely to be married or cohabitating then merely unattractive or even average to good looking women, and their spouses tended to earn more then their better-looking female counterparts. They infer that intelligent men have a preference to marry or mate with very unattractive women.


Kinda reminds me of Sam Bankman Friedman and his gf.

But this is just more proof that a woman's looks don't really play a part in whether she's capable of finding a partner.

Meanwhile: Being unattractive reduces men's chances of finding partners, but not women's


  • For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.
  • For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring.
  • Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. The results for women indicate that attractiveness did not matter.
Literally everything we've been told about how looks affect you is a lie. We are constantly told that ugly women have it the worst and that being unattractive as a man isn't a hurdle at all. Meanwhile the truth is the opposite.
Less options
 
its because they settle and marry into money
 
UNNATTRACTIVE HOLES ARE THE REASON WE ARE INCEL THEY ALL NEED TO BE FUCKING STERILIZE AND GENOCIDED ESPECIALLY SHE BOON (in mein kraft)
 
Foids can't lose no matter what.
 
obviously, there are so many disparate normies they will do everything for pussy
 
obviously, there are so many disparate normies they will do everything for pussy
 
Did you know shorter women have higher fecundity too because it's easier for average heighted males to pork them?
 
For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.
Jfl even “educated” women aren’t immune to Chad influence
 
The existence of femcels once again debunked (water wet)

The analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) shows that very unattractive women were significantly more likely to be married at Age 29 than unattractive or average-looking women, and their spouses or partners earned significantly more than those of unattractive or average-looking women.

The authors concluded that 'very unattractive' women were more likely to be married or cohabitating then merely unattractive or even average to good looking women, and their spouses tended to earn more then their better-looking female counterparts. They infer that intelligent men have a preference to marry or mate with very unattractive women.


Kinda reminds me of Sam Bankman Friedman and his gf.

But this is just more proof that a woman's looks don't really play a part in whether she's capable of finding a partner.

Meanwhile: Being unattractive reduces men's chances of finding partners, but not women's


  • For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.
  • For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring.
  • Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. The results for women indicate that attractiveness did not matter.
Literally everything we've been told about how looks affect you is a lie. We are constantly told that ugly women have it the worst and that being unattractive as a man isn't a hurdle at all. Meanwhile the truth is the opposite.
Pussy, smv,
 
If it have a pussy than she is a wife material
 
No matter how ugly or deformed a foid is she'll never be loney.
 
Would never date an unattractive foid. Even it was the last thing handed to me.
 
  • For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.
  • For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring.
  • Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. The results for women indicate that attractiveness did not matter.
Literally everything we've been told about how looks affect you is a lie. We are constantly told that ugly women have it the worst and that being unattractive as a man isn't a hurdle at all. Meanwhile the truth is the opposite.
Why can't at least this be gender swapped:feelsbadman:. Would love a highly-educated, high-income wife for my ugly ass:feelscry::cryfeels:.
 

Similar threads

TheJoker
Replies
5
Views
172
TheJoker
TheJoker
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
10
Views
293
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
S
Replies
8
Views
444
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
Profligate
Replies
31
Views
1K
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top