Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Who is smarter, normies or niggers

W

WizardofSoda

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Posts
7,602
I would say normies are a lot better at memorization from school and tv and then getting through school and college. But the niggers are superior in free thinking, whereas normies will actually surround and attack someone with ideas different than the normies memorized.
 
niggers are pretty fucking retarded man

normies are sly and deceptive which takes some IQ but niggers are mindless agressive idiots
 
never had any encounters with niggers
 
Normies a pack of vile hyenas.
 
never had any encounters with niggers
Consider yourself fortunate honestly.
I don't consider all black people niggers, just the dumb annoying agressive ones.
They also love to mention they are from specific area and that people kill people there or whatever so by proxy they try to appear tough or whatever and black culture loves gangbanging and living in the hood.

I would sooner be afraid of some ER type incel killing me in a shooting spree than a retarded nigger telling me he is from compton or some shit.
God niggers are literally like fucking 9 years old in adult bodies.
 
ah nice, a zoological debate
 
Like I honestly feel bad for the blackcels on here calling them niggers.

They should be seperated, you have normal black people and then you have niggers, literally a different species. Feels like niggers were grabbed from 1000 years ago from barbaric tribes and have dropped in here and kept their stupid tribal nigger ways. They act like tribes shouting and shit with their stupid music that all sounds the same and its all horrible but they listen to it because they are niggers.
 
Like I honestly feel bad for the blackcels on here calling them niggers.

They should be seperated, you have normal black people and then you have niggers, literally a different species. Feels like niggers were grabbed from 1000 years ago from barbaric tribes and have dropped in here and kept their stupid tribal nigger ways. They act like tribes shouting and shit with their stupid music that all sounds the same and its all horrible but they listen to it because they are niggers.
There is a distinction between the group as a whole and any one individual.

If you're a blackcel on here, first off, you found this site and have an increased chance of being first world, you didn't fall for blue- or redpill cope, you aren't homeless out on the streets or in jail, all those mean you have an increased chance of being above whatever is the average for your population in terms of IQ.

Secondly, we are struggling with similar issues, so I actually have a reason to care and sympathise with you, which is not the case for the groups of blacks I see roaming around the train station in my city at night.

Thirdly, there was at least some selective immigration for blacks in the first world, so their average IQ is often still higher than w/e it was for the population in their home country or the COO of their parents or grandparents. Just look at this shit to see how bad things are over in Africa. Some of this is enviormental, but only some of it.
Countries by IQ   Average IQ by Country 2023   worldpopulationreviewcom
Countries by IQ   Average IQ by Country 2023 2   worldpopulationreviewcom
Countries by IQ   Average IQ by Country 2023 3   worldpopulationreviewcom
Countries by IQ   Average IQ by Country 2023 4   worldpopulationreviewcom


And lastly, use averages when it's applicable, e.g., when you are dealing with strangers or looking at dynamics playing out nation-wide, but on a site like this it's very possible to judge users based on their own individual output, so clinging to IQ averages becomes increasingly inaccurate by comparison.
 
Last edited:
I would say normies are a lot better at memorization from school and tv and then getting through school and college. But the niggers are superior in free thinking, whereas normies will actually surround and attack someone with ideas different than the normies memorized.
Neither, both are subhuman scum
 
man, niggers have literally 70 IQ, its considered mental disability, retardation
 
Thirdly, there was at least some selective immigration for blacks in the first world, so their average IQ is often still higher than w/e it was for the population in their home country or the COO of their parents or grandparents. Just look at this shit to see how bad things are over in Africa. Some of this is enviormental, but only some of it.
40 IQ? No fucking way? Right?
 
40 IQ? No fucking way? Right?
some of the numbers are funky because it's hard to get lots of good data from those hellholes, and there is certainly a lot of influence from malnurishment, parasites and diseases, but yeah, some of those countries probably top out below 80, 70 or even 60 average IQ.
 
Last edited:
some of the numbers are funky because it's hard to get lots of good data from those hellholes, and there is certainly a lot of influence from malnurishment, parasites and diseases, but yeah, some of those countries probably top out below 80, 70 or even 60 average IQ.

 
Childhood intelligence is heritable, highly polygenic

and associated with
FNBP1L



Table of Contents​

SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE4

Calculation of the average effective sample size from each cohort4

Study Cohort Information4


Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)4

Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 (LBC1921)6

Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936)7

Brisbane Adolescent Twins Study, Queensland Institute of Medical Research (QIMR) cohort8

Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study9

Twins of Early Development Study (TEDS)10

Generation Rotterdam Study (GenR)13

Netherlands Twin Register (NTR)14

University of Minnesota Study (UMN)15

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES17

Supplementary Table 1. Quality controls of the discovery cohorts17

Supplementary Table 2. The effect size of the top 100 SNPs (discovery + replication cohorts) sorted based on the association P-value. The direction was ordered as QIMR, ALSPAC, LBC21, LBC36, RAINE, TEDS, NTR, GenR, and UMN. 0 indicates that the effect size is zero.18

Supplementary Table 3. Top 20 genes sorted based on P-value from the gene-based analysis in the discovery cohorts (N=12,441) and the corresponding P-values in the replication cohorts21

Supplementary Table 4. Genetic prediction analysis results in three independent replication samples, i.e. GenR, NTR and UMN. R2 is the proportion of the phenotypic variance in childhood intelligence that was explained by genetic predictors that are derived from selecting SNPs in the meta-analysis at different P-value thresholds.22

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES23

Supplementary Figure 1. Allele frequency between each of the discovery cohorts and the frequency of QIMR cohort. The apparent discrepancy in a small proportion of SNPs in TEDS cohort may be due to TEDS being the only sample using Affymetrix chip rather than Illumina chip.23

Supplementary Figure 2. Allele frequency between each of the replication cohorts and the frequency of QIMR cohort.24

Supplementary Figure 3. Manhattan plots of the discovery cohorts25

Supplementary Figure 4. QQ plots of the discovery cohorts26

Supplementary Figure 5. Association P-values around the most significantly associated SNP in the meta-analysis of the discovery cohorts27

Supplementary Figure 6. Association P-values around FNBP1L, the most significantly associated gene from gene-based analysis28

Supplementary Figure 7. Effect size from the meta-analysis of the discovery cohorts vs the replication cohorts29

1696334175161

1696334197490

1696334206457


...

Rs979201


1000Genomes_30x Global Study-wide6404C=0.6249T=0.3751
1000Genomes_30x African Sub1786C=0.2872T=0.7128
1000Genomes_30x Europe Sub1266C=0.7970T=0.2030
1000Genomes_30x South Asian Sub1202C=0.8128T=0.1872
1000Genomes_30x East Asian Sub1170C=0.6615T=0.3385
1000Genomes_30x American Sub980C=0.744T=0.256
Rs1107154


1000Genomes_30x Global Study-wide6404G=0.4849A=0.5151
1000Genomes_30x African Sub1786G=0.0336A=0.9664
1000Genomes_30x Europe Sub1266G=0.6335A=0.3665
1000Genomes_30x South Asian Sub1202G=0.7196A=0.2804
1000Genomes_30x East Asian Sub1170G=0.6009A=0.3991
1000Genomes_30x American Sub980G=0.689A=0.311
Rs1421594


1000Genomes_30x Global Study-wide6404G=0.5506A=0.4494
1000Genomes_30x African Sub1786G=0.5190A=0.4810
1000Genomes_30x Europe Sub1266G=0.6311A=0.3689
1000Genomes_30x South Asian Sub1202G=0.4759A=0.5241
1000Genomes_30x East Asian Sub1170G=0.5795A=0.4205
1000Genomes_30x American Sub980G=0.561A=0.439
Rs1516194


1000Genomes_30x Global Study-wide6404T=0.2294G=0.7706
1000Genomes_30x African Sub1786T=0.4272G=0.5728
1000Genomes_30x Europe Sub1266T=0.1580G=0.8420
1000Genomes_30x South Asian Sub1202T=0.1131G=0.8869
1000Genomes_30x East Asian Sub1170T=0.1701G=0.8299
1000Genomes_30x American Sub980T=0.174G=0.826
Rs7291469


1000Genomes_30x Global Study-wide6404G=0.7876A=0.2124
1000Genomes_30x African Sub1786G=0.6926A=0.3074
1000Genomes_30x Europe Sub1266G=0.7385A=0.2615
1000Genomes_30x South Asian Sub1202G=0.7438A=0.2562
1000Genomes_30x East Asian Sub1170G=0.9974A=0.0026
1000Genomes_30x American Sub980G=0.828A=0.172
Rs13260283



1000Genomes_30x Global Study-wide6404T=0.3438G=0.6562
1000Genomes_30x African Sub1786T=0.6114G=0.3886
1000Genomes_30x Europe Sub1266T=0.1777G=0.8223
1000Genomes_30x South Asian Sub1202T=0.3353G=0.6647
1000Genomes_30x East Asian Sub1170T=0.2778G=0.7222
1000Genomes_30x American Sub980T=0.160G=0.840
 
1696334475079


Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)​

Cohort description: ALSPAC is a population based longitudinal pregnancy-ascertained birth-cohort in the Bristol area of the UK. Specifically, recruitment sought to enrol all pregnant women with an estimated delivery date between 1st April 1991 and 31st December 19921, who where residents within three Health Districts of the former administrative county of Avon2. The initial cohort included 14,541 pregnancies and additional children eligible using the original enrolment definition were recruited up to the age of 18 years, increasing the total number of pregnancies to 15,247 (4.1% Non-White mothers). Information on the children from these pregnancies is available from questionnaires, clinical assessments, linkage to health and administrative records as well as biological samples including genetic and epigenetic information. Ethical approval was obtained from the ALSPAC Law and Ethics Committee (IRB00003312) and the Local Research Ethics Committees, and written informed consent was provided by all parents.

Intelligence measure: Intelligence in ALSPAC children at the age of 8 years was measured with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III). A short version of the test consisting of alternate items only (except the Coding task) was applied by trained psychologists. Verbal (information, similarities, arithmetic, vocabulary, comprehension) and performance (picture completion, coding, picture arrangement, block design, object assembly) subscales were administered, each subtest was age-scaled according to population norms and a summary score for total IQ derived. Pertinent to this analysis, we generated sex and principal component (i.e. the two most significant principal components from Eigenstrat analysis, see below) adjusted Z-standardised intelligence quotient (IQ) scores for independent ALSPAC children with information on total IQ and genome-wide data. For this, IQ scores within a range of ±4SD relative to the total ALSPAC sample were regressed on sex (coded as 1 = male and 2 = female) and the principal components. The residuals were Z-transformed and subjected to genome-wide analysis.

Twins of Early Development Study (TEDS)​

Cohort description: The Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) is a study of twins born in England and Wales between 1994 and 199620. TEDS twins have participated in a dozen projects over 15 years. The TEDS families are representative of the general population in terms of parental education, ethnicity and employment status21. The project has received ethical approval from the appropriate institutional review boards. Parental consent was obtained for each subject before the testing commenced. Twins with severe medical problems or severe birth complications or whose zygosity could not be determined were excluded from the sample. To help ensure homogeneity of ancestry, the sample was restricted to families who identified themselves as white and whose first language was English. After exclusions the sample with at least one cognitive test available at age 12 was 10,459 individuals (mean age = 11.6, SD = 0.7).

Intelligence measure: Individuals were tested at 12 years using two verbal and two nonverbal measures22. Test scores were adjusted for age within each testing period, and first principal component g scores were derived using principal component analysis implemented in R. This g score was standardized to a mean of 0 and unit variance, and used for the GWAS analysis.

Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study​

Cohort description: The Raine study is a prospective pregnancy cohort study of 2,868 live births. Women were recruited between May 1989 and November 1991 (N=2,900) through the public antenatal clinic at King Edward Memorial Hospital (KEMH) and nearby private clinics in Perth, Western Australia. Comprehensive data regarding social and demographic characteristics were collected at 18 and at 34 weeks gestation. Data were collected at birth, including physiological and clinical information, and the study children and their families provided sociodemographic and behavioural data at one, two, three, five, eight, ten, 14 and 17 years of age. Complete details of enrolment methods have been published elsewhere16. The Human Ethics Committees at KEMH and/or Princess Margaret Hospital for Children approved the protocols for the study

Intelligence measure: General cognitive ability (‘g factor’) was estimated based on four cognitive measures carried out at approximately 10 years of age (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test17, Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices18, Symbol Digits Modalities Test (SDMT)19 written score and SDMT oral score. Principal component analysis was performed using each of the four cognitive measures and the first principal component was used for analyses.

Brisbane Adolescent Twins Study, Queensland Institute of Medical Research (QIMR) cohort​

Cohort description: The Brisbane Adolescent Twin Study cohort11 is a population sample that supports ongoing studies conducted at the Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research (QIMR), Brisbane, on a wide range of traits. IQ data were collected as part of the cognition project12, which targets twins aged 16 years and their siblings and were available for 1752 individuals (778 families), with a mean age of 16.5 years (±1.0 years, range 15.4-28.9 years). Exclusion criteria were parental or self-report of head injury, neurological or psychiatric illness, substance abuse/dependence, or current use of psychoactive medication in either twin. Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants and from a parent or guardian for those aged under 18 years. Ethics approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at QIMR.

Intelligence measure: Full-scale IQ in the QIMR cohort was measured using a shortened version of the computerised Multi-dimensional Aptitude Battery (MAB)13, a general intelligence test similar to Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. The shortened MAB includes three verbal subtests (information, arithmetic, vocabulary) and two performance subtests (spatial, object assembly). Scaled scores for full-scale IQ were computed in accordance with the manual.
 
Of-course. Good thing I'm feeling better currently.
 
Oh yeah, an argument for us being differend subspecies can easily be made, I'm too lazy to look through my folders but I have some data to support the idea with. But i wouldn't bother with that in a public debate, even if it is an anonymous one online. There already is close to a 0% chance to convince anyone not already in on it of race realism, bringing that point in only makes it even less likely to get more people on board.
 
Like I honestly feel bad for the blackcels on here calling them niggers.

They should be seperated, you have normal black people and then you have niggers, literally a different species. Feels like niggers were grabbed from 1000 years ago from barbaric tribes and have dropped in here and kept their stupid tribal nigger ways. They act like tribes shouting and shit with their stupid music that all sounds the same and its all horrible but they listen to it because they are niggers.
It's not like it's niggers vs good black people who dindu nuffin. There's a whole pile of shit above that of blacks who support BLM and want reparations and affirmative action and justify crime and hate white people. Honestly I'd prefer some thug nigger over those people sometimes, at least those thugs can be funny.
 
Niggers are obviously smarter, normshits can't think for themselves.
 
Normies

Average nigger IQ ranges between mid to upper 80s
 
This shit is fucking retarted
 
Like I honestly feel bad for the blackcels on here calling them niggers.

They should be seperated, you have normal black people and then you have niggers, literally a different species. Feels like niggers were grabbed from 1000 years ago from barbaric tribes and have dropped in here and kept their stupid tribal nigger ways. They act like tribes shouting and shit with their stupid music that all sounds the same and its all horrible but they listen to it because they are niggers.
I used to be like this until you realize even the Blackcels are absolute niggers. You need to drop the facade all the supposed niggers you find chill irl Just because theyre nerdy ARE OPENLY INSULTING YOU.

Niggers are savages not human.

However I absolutely despise normies and The normies who infiltrate incel Spaces even if theyre ugly Im glad theyre incel
 
Last edited:
Niggers can be normies

Most normies nowadays try to act like niggers

Some niggers are smarter than normies, but all normies are p retarded tbh
 
Normies are snakes and are pretty stupid niggers though make chimpanzees look like geniuses.
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
6
Views
442
Bastardily
Bastardily
RealSchizo
Replies
18
Views
444
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top