Most women seem to enjoy the benefits of big government, they enjoy having the unlimited access to other mens tax dollars without having the need to fornicate with them, the laws in place to protect them from harm (examples such as Obama's domestic violence laws and the equal rights amendment), however, if you noticed a lot of men, conversely, take up libertarian stances, there's probably a reason why. A lot of men enjoy being able to keep the entirety of their paychecks, which if it were allowed, and no government oversight wouldn't force them to pay their fair share, women would essentially have to rely on men directly for their commodities. Of course no (gays excluded for obvious reasons) man is going to let this pass unless he gets something in return (voluntary exchange) for his services, barring internet onlyfans simps, which is a part of modern decadence mostly reserved for the most simpy of zoomer kids and some late millennials. He would at least require compensation right? Obviously you know what I mean when I say this.
However, going further, lets say a shitload of laws were repealed too. The further the state removes its presence, the more barbarous men will become. Obviously Thomas Hobbes warned of this, but like Aristotle’s concept of polis everything will end up re-arranged according to natural virtue. At that point in time, there will be a rapid reorganization of society that (in all likelihood) would be a lot like the primitive era, regardless how much technology we've accumulated. Then women would have to acquire security by marriage, instead of prostituting themselves like they do in the modern era. This in which has run counter to Karl Marx's assumption of history that mankind began as collectivist entity. What Marx fails to realize, is that, he doesn't account for sexual behavior in any of his writings (im just assuming here) or that essentially he's borrowing from Rousseau's concept "man in nature good person" which post-Romantic thinkers like Nietzsche and Proudhon, sought to remove from discourse. Essentially, there is a trade-off between male happiness and female happiness which I think only people like Sigmund Freud (yes I know he's a jew) ever entertained, though I tend to think its not just intrinsic human nature but also extra-psychological qualities like the role of the state in human affairs and the general zeitgeist (borrowed from Hegel) of the current era, depending on which era it is. Today we live in a very feminized time and place so the idea so those kinds of concepts will probably never be entertained by the academic mainstream for some time until possibly way after most of us are gone and gerontocracy has kicked the bucket. It doesn't seem like they're willing to let it go just yet.
However, going further, lets say a shitload of laws were repealed too. The further the state removes its presence, the more barbarous men will become. Obviously Thomas Hobbes warned of this, but like Aristotle’s concept of polis everything will end up re-arranged according to natural virtue. At that point in time, there will be a rapid reorganization of society that (in all likelihood) would be a lot like the primitive era, regardless how much technology we've accumulated. Then women would have to acquire security by marriage, instead of prostituting themselves like they do in the modern era. This in which has run counter to Karl Marx's assumption of history that mankind began as collectivist entity. What Marx fails to realize, is that, he doesn't account for sexual behavior in any of his writings (im just assuming here) or that essentially he's borrowing from Rousseau's concept "man in nature good person" which post-Romantic thinkers like Nietzsche and Proudhon, sought to remove from discourse. Essentially, there is a trade-off between male happiness and female happiness which I think only people like Sigmund Freud (yes I know he's a jew) ever entertained, though I tend to think its not just intrinsic human nature but also extra-psychological qualities like the role of the state in human affairs and the general zeitgeist (borrowed from Hegel) of the current era, depending on which era it is. Today we live in a very feminized time and place so the idea so those kinds of concepts will probably never be entertained by the academic mainstream for some time until possibly way after most of us are gone and gerontocracy has kicked the bucket. It doesn't seem like they're willing to let it go just yet.
