Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Why genetics-only WEAKENS the Blackpill - GENES+CULTURE is the only way to make the Blackpill thrive

K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Wizard
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
4,365
Now that my other thread has been restored by our beloved ubermod and BDFL @Fat Link (thanks to him), I think I should try to make my claims clearer, and especially explain why THEY DO NOT UNDERMINE THE BLACKPILL, on the contrary.

First of all, let this be clear: most people who pretend to support the genetics-only interpretation of the blackpill know nothing about genetics and make ridiculous claims in its name.
Genetically inferior men have NEVER been successful with women. NEVER.
male Genetics among mammals have always been filtered through alpha-male fighting, never based on looks.
we are literally having new generations born right now, that are passing through the genetic filters created by the social trends which are picking up and not even showing signs of slowing down anytime soon, after they've been running for decades already.
midwit = thinking that human reproduction, evolution and sharing of genes somehow goes "on break" while various social trends and movements play out :feelshaha:
evolution and genetics are literally wiping us out RIGHT NOW and you're telling me how it's all a social construct or some shit :feelshaha:
very soon a whole generation will be born that is literally GENETICALLY BRED to go along with all these social trends and feminized thinking and oversocialization, and you're telling me that just a social construct is at fault and that's what really matters
It's basically Darwin. Weak genes perish while strong ones procreate.
literally online dating can change the genetic landscape instantly, we're not animals that fuck each other in a small herd anymore :feelskek:
Human genetics are the slowest to change on the planet. Our genome is the most complex and therefore has the lowest probability of a viable mutated offspring. Plus, we reproduce very slowly (every 30 years on average); slower than any other animal species. As a result, our genes change very slowly, on the order of hundreds of thousands of years, at least.

However, our genome includes features that no other animal species has: a capacity for language and therefore culture. Culture acts as an additional genetic layer on top of our actual genes and that is what makes us more adaptable than other species. An animal who needs to adapt to a colder climates has to wait for its fur to evolve. We can adapt far faster because our culture will integrate the notion of clothing and the requisite technology to kill fur animals and treat their skins as clothes. That is why we have adapted to every possible climate on earth, something no other species has ever done.

Our behavior is based on CULTURE + GENES in EVERYTHING we do. That is why we dominate the natural world.
There’s nothing cultural about lookism, it’s so innate to humanity and even animals to prefer good looks that even literal newborns prefer attractive faces to unattractive ones.
This is genetic superstition. Cultural norms dominate aesthetics. Look at the depictions of "beauty" from the past (paintings, etc). None appears attractive to us today. In medieval China, a special edict was issued to ensure that no one was forced to marry Kipchaks, because they were too ugly:

"if Chinese persons do not wish to marry Qincha [Kipchak] [they] latter may marry among their own race. [...] Kipchaks have light hair and blue eyes. Their appearance is vile and peculiar, so there are those who do not wish to marry them."

In other words, Kipchaks were blond Chads with blue eyes (they were steppe warriors), so no Chinese noodlewhore wanted to marry them!
There are entire science books full of evidence. In every pack, the alpha who gets to impregnate is always the biggest and strongest animal (best genetics).
The biggest and strongest, yes. Not the handsomest.
you think people are breeding like they're birds on a small island, evolving traits very slowly and often stagnating.
meanwhile dating apps and Wizz Air mean you can have genetic change that is fast and aggressive similar to animal breeders doing selective breeding on individual animals, in order to create new breeds in just a few generations.
Yes. Human genetic drift is the slowest in the world, as explained above
Exactly. Looks hierarchy is so innate to humans that we can actually smell how (a)symmetrical someone’s face is, and male bodies even lower their production of testosterone when they smell a male with a more asymmetrical face, because he doesn’t present a sexual threat.
Superstition
We are INCELS because of our genes ,and most men in the past are just betabux and foids needed us
Gross oversimplification.

Now, I can foresee the explosion of claims about "STUDIES, STUDIES, STUDIES" that this will trigger. Sorry guys, most studies are false. Academia is completely broken and people are allowed to produce bullshit studies by the ton. You just cannot trust "studies". The only thing you can trust in human genetics are the very basic and fundamental stuff, like the slow rate of successful genetic mutation, which is a straightforward consequence of our genome's size. Linking any human behavior to genes is unscientific because we cannot do real experiments. To do that, that we would need to have thousands of concentration camps in which we would vary the circumstances to see how people react and we would have to breed people in those camps for hundreds of thousand of years to see what genetic changes can do. Failing that, any "study" is just guessing and pseudo-science.

Now, about the Blackpill.

The Blackpill is a body of observations and I believe that all these observations are correct. Foids today are hypergamous, Chad-only, devious, hypocritical, cold, non-empathetic, aggressive, scornful, violent, and they treat incels like pariah untermenschen. All that is indeed correct.

What I deny is that there is a simple isomorphism between human genetics and those observations.

Like in everything about humans, GENES + CULTURE have to be taken into account. GENES-only explanations are going to be superficially plausible but in fact incorrect.

The reason I mentioned HITLER in my previous thread is that I can see that all those who are noisily defending a GENES-only interpretation of the Blackpill are repeating the mistake that Nazis did in the 1930s. Nazis said: All problems in Germany = bad Jew genes. This was of course false. And it is even more ridiculous when you realize that Nazism is in fact an inverted copy of Judaism!
  • Master race = Chosen people
  • Hitler (the man who will establish the dominance of the Master Race) = the Messiah (the man will establish Jewish domination over the Goyim)
  • Non-Germans (untermenschen) are inferior = Non-Jews (the Goyim) are inferior
THIS is the real dirty secret about the Jews. They had it coming because Nazism was a copy of their religion. Jews HAD BEEN NAZIS for 3000 years.

Opting for a GENES-only interpretation of the Blackpill will have the same result as the GENES-only politics of the Nazis: suicide. Nazism will never rise again. It will forever be the darkest joke in History. We incels, will not even be a joke if we continue like this, we will just be a footnote: "short-lived subculture of the early XXIst century"

Don't kill the Blackpill. Accept the effort to make it viable in the long term. Study History. Study Religion. Study Culture. It is the only way.
 
Last edited:
dn rd + lol at mods for encouraging this schizo
 
Just read incels.wiki. no need for bullshit theorizing when the hard facts are laid right in front of us.
 
male Genetics among mammals have always been filtered through alpha-male fighting, never based on looks.
Stopped reading right her. Just a redpill cope thread.
 
Last edited:
Just read incels.wiki. no need for bullshit theorizing when the hard facts are laid right in front of us.
Incel Wiki is just a summary of what Incels have been saying over the last six or seven years. On many aspects, it is wrong
 
I always agreed the heightpill is much more brutal than facepill, so this isn't a surprise to me. I don't think height worship will stop even if Ishtar worship stops. Both male and females worship height, males unknowingly give more respect to those that are taller than them and females lust for taller males. Face appreciation depends on culture but there's some certain elements that are appreciated no matter what culture it is - facial symmetry and youth. This doesn't apply to height, height appreciation doesn't change because of culture.
I think you are probably right. Leadership has almost always been associated with being tall.

Why did the Ancient Greeks, Egyptians and Babylonians prefer more fair skin women then? I don't have to quote because I think you know what I'm talking about.
I think that in big empires which made it possible for people with different skin tones to meet (otherwise everything stays local), then indeed, lighter skin tends to win because of the opposition between light and darkness. Everyone is afraid of the dark and so darker skin people appear to be "people of darkness".

African Americans are overly represented in the Western Media yet their SMV is still lower than a lot of other races.
That is debatable. BBC is a thing among white sluts.

Sheboons, yes, have lower SMV than whites, but for males, it is hard to tell. And the thugmaxxing that urban blacks do is a major source of SMV. Gangstas get laid a lot, and not only with sheboons. The company that owns the Tushy and Vixen porn label also made a channel called Blacked.com, which is exclusively dedicated to white chicks being railed by blacks. Isn't that a sign of SMV?

I think fairer skin is innately attractive to both men and women but unique facial features, hair colour and eye colour will differ depending on the culture. Hence it explains why the Chinese found the Kipchaks ugly.
Pretty much, yes.
 
dn rd + lol at mods for encouraging this schizo
This.
Mods are so pathetically desperate for site traffic that they will allow schizos and spam trannies to litter the forum with nonsense, driving anyone with a brain away from this shithole forum.
 
This.
Mods are so pathetically desperate for site traffic that they will allow schizos and spam trannies to litter the forum with nonsense, driving anyone with a brain away from this shithole forum.
Of course everybody thinks that incels are braindead failures when their main forum only consists of schizos, autists and spamtrannies because the moderators are so goddamn incompetent at their job that they drive people with a brain away from the forum.
 
dn rd + lol at mods for encouraging this schizo
Of course everybody thinks that incels are braindead failures when their main forum only consists of schizos, autists and spamtrannies because the moderators are so goddamn incompetent at their job that they drive people with a brain away from the forum.
Ok, you too. You are some of the most stupid representatives of the Genetics-only BrownPill (brown like crap, brown like the shirts), so you are now going to listen to me.

The mods (except @Dregster) understand far better than you think what the situation of inceldom is. They see that if it comes to be defined by a single stupid stand of genetics-only idiocy, it will die, just like Nazism died. They also understand that even having a majority of idiots like you (midwits in fact) on the forum is not altogether catastrophic, provided that there are a few dissenting voices. These dissenting, high effort, voices are what will maintain the attractivity of the forum, and of inceldom as a whole, in the long run. So, seethe all you like, while the grownups work to maintain the integrity of the Blackpill; the real Blackpill.

@TheProphetMuscle and @Caesercel have expressed their approval of what I am saying in various ways. I think they understand the value of it.
 
Ok, you too. You are some of the most stupid representatives of the Genetics-only BrownPill (brown like crap, brown like the shirts), so you are now going to listen to me.

The mods (except @Dregster) understand far better than you think what the situation of inceldom is. They see that if it comes to be defined by a single stupid stand of genetics-only idiocy, it will die, just like Nazism died. They also understand that even having a majority of idiots like you (midwits in fact) on the forum is not altogether catastrophic, provided that there are a few dissenting voices. These dissenting, high effort, voices are what will maintain the attractivity of the forum, and of inceldom as a whole, in the long run. So, seethe all you like, while the grownups work to maintain the integrity of the Blackpill; the real Blackpill.

@TheProphetMuscle and @Caesercel have expressed their approval of what I am saying in various ways. I think they understand the value of it.
Keep writing essays, schizo.
Seeing how deeply invested you are in your borderline mentally ill nonsense theories nobody gives a fuck about is actually quite sad.
The blackpill is based on biological and statistical facts. An obese autistic schizo rotting in the outbacks of India (you) won't change that no matter how many delusional essays he shits out on the internet.
 
Keep writing essays, schizo.
Seeing how deeply invested you are in your borderline mentally ill nonsense theories nobody gives a fuck about is actually quite sad.
The blackpill is based on biological and statistical facts. An obese autistic schizo rotting in the outbacks of India (you) won't change that no matter how many delusional essays he shits out on the internet.
You are even more autistic than I am, midwit. To the point of even repeating stock-phrases like "obese autistic schizo rotting in the outbacks of India" in post after post. Just stop eating your own shit and think for a change.
 
Incel Wiki is just a summary of what Incels have been saying over the last six or seven years. On many aspects, it is wrong
Openly denying blackpill and mods don't even care. This forum is such a shithole and mods are complete morons. No wonder everybody with an IQ above 80 has already left. I hope I can do the same this time.
 
Openly denying blackpill and mods don't even care.
The blackpill is not an orthodoxy set in store and the Wiki is not scripture dumbass. This isn't Mecca and your overlord @based_meme is not the chief Ayatollah. Open your eyes and start looking at reality, for fuck's sake
 
The blackpill is not an orthodoxy set in store and the Wiki is not scripture dumbass. This isn't Mecca and your overlord @based_meme is not the chief Ayatollah. Open your eyes and start looking at reality, for fuck's sake
Who?
Why keep tagging people who aren't even involved in the discussion?
Rent free in your head, you chubby pathetic schizo. :feelshaha:
 
This is genetic superstition. Cultural norms dominate aesthetics. Look at the depictions of "beauty" from the past (paintings, etc). None appears attractive to us today. In medieval China, a special edict was issued to ensure that no one was forced to marry Kipchaks, because they were too ugly:

"if Chinese persons do not wish to marry Qincha [Kipchak] [they] latter may marry among their own race. [...] Kipchaks have light hair and blue eyes. Their appearance is vile and peculiar, so there are those who do not wish to marry them."

In other words, Kipchaks were blond Chads with blue eyes (they were steppe warriors), so no Chinese noodlewhore wanted to marry them!

Good that you’ve mentioned this. Yes, culture influences aesthetics, but only to a point, and there is a good amount of evidence that all human groups ultimately prefer their own. Those Chinese weren’t exposed to media painting Kipchaks as more attractive, therefore they naturally saw them as ugly as they looked much different from them. Same with Romans calling Sarmatians “repulsive”, or Arabs calling their European and African slaves ugly compared to them.

However, that only goes so far. Facial symmetry, youthfulness, and exaggerated secondary sex traits (big and full breasts for women, tall height for men, and facial masculinity or femininity), for just the ones off of the top of my mind at the moment, are pretty much universally seen as attractive, which is what I was trying to show you with those studies.

And also, keep in mind that even the fact that, in absence of media promoting other group’s beauty standards, all groups of humans prefer their own, that can also be genetically explained by an inherent attraction to genetic similarity, so just how much culture ultimately influences is still very much questionable.

Superstition

That’s a peer-reviewed study, but OK.

Just read incels.wiki. no need for bullshit theorizing when the hard facts are laid right in front of us.

I showed him those and he just brushed it aside, so... I mean, he’s free to believe whatever he thinks is the truth, but the beliefs he’s rallying against here have some pretty solid evidence backing them.

Incel Wiki is just a summary of what Incels have been saying over the last six or seven years. On many aspects, it is wrong

I’ll admit that some things there are a bit questionable, specifically the ones that aren’t actual studies, but those are just a tiny bit of it. The rest are, well, full-blown, actual, peer-reviewed studies, which are rather hard to defeat by comments on the internet.

Stopped reading right her. Just a redpill cope thread.

Definitely could be called that.
 
Good that you’ve mentioned this. Yes, culture influences aesthetics, but only to a point, and there is a good amount of evidence that all human groups ultimately prefer their own. Those Chinese weren’t exposed to media painting Kipchaks as more attractive, therefore they naturally saw them as ugly as they looked much different from them. Same with Romans calling Sarmatians “repulsive”, or Arabs calling their European and African slaves ugly compared to them.

However, that only goes so far. Facial symmetry, youthfulness, and exaggerated secondary sex traits (big and full breasts for women, tall height for men, and facial masculinity or femininity), for just the ones off of the top of my mind at the moment, are pretty much universally seen as attractive, which is what I was trying to show you with those studies.

And also, keep in mind that even the fact that, in absence of media promoting other group’s beauty standards, all groups of humans prefer their own, that can also be genetically explained by an inherent attraction to genetic similarity, so just how much culture ultimately influences is still very much questionable.



That’s a peer-reviewed study, but OK.



I showed him those and he just brushed it aside, so... I mean, he’s free to believe whatever he thinks is the truth, but the beliefs he’s rallying against here have some pretty solid evidence backing them.



I’ll admit that some things there are a bit questionable, specifically the ones that aren’t actual studies, but those are just a tiny bit of it. The rest are, well, full-blown, actual, peer-reviewed studies, which are rather hard to defeat by comments on the internet.



Definitely could be called that.
Why the fuck didn’t the site allow me to post this when I used actual replies instead of nameless quotes like this?? Any mods know wtf is that bug?
 
Last edited:
Very high IQ posts as usual don't know why so many people are putting a bad connotation around autism that just shows how focused you are on this topic and obsessed in a good way.
 
Genetics piss me off sometimes.
 
Genetic (Base):

Female attraction to, bigger, taller, stronger men. - Sign you could physically protect her. This is universal and applies to all mammals.
Deep Voice
High Status
Low Bodyfat - High body fat would indicate you have genes to survive famines, which means you don't come from wealth.
Healthy Radiant Skin - Sign of Health
Full Head of Hair - Sign of Youth & Health
Thick eyebrows - Sign of Youth & Health

Cultural (Variations):

Skin Color, Hair Color, Eye Color
Slight variations on exact level of body fat and muscle seen as Ideal - For example, in more aggressive cultures, higher levels of muscle mass are seen as more attractive on average.
Warrior Skull vs Normal Skull - In more aggressive cultures a warrior skull is seen as more attractive
Haircut & Style Trends.
Subtle specific facial features such as dimples.

Side Note:

If you read a lot of the woke propaganda, you'd believe that fat people were once seen as attractive because it was a sign of wealth. This is bullshit to placate fat female readers, weakly supported by cherry picked "evidence". Healthy has always been seen as more attractive than unhealthy, though there have always been desperate simps willing to settle for and pretend they like fat women because that's the best they can get.

Look at the dumb bitch trying to argue that corsets weren't about making women look less fat:
 
Last edited:
Genetic (Base):

Female attraction to, bigger, taller, stronger men. - Sign you could physically protect her. This is universal and applies to all mammals.
Deep Voice
High Status
Low Bodyfat - High body fat would indicate you have genes to survive famines, which means you don't come from wealth.
Healthy Radiant Skin - Sign of Health
Full Head of Hair - Sign of Youth & Health
Thick eyebrows - Sign of Youth & Health

Cultural (Variations):

Skin Color, Hair Color, Eye Color
Slight variations on exact level of body fat and muscle seen as Ideal - For example, in more aggressive cultures, higher levels of muscle mass are seen as more attractive on average.
Warrior Skull vs Normal Skull - In more aggressive cultures a warrior skull is seen as more attractive
Haircut & Style Trends.
Subtle specific facial features such as dimples.

Side Note:

If you read a lot of the woke propaganda, you'd believe that fat people were once seen as attractive because it was a sign of wealth. This is bullshit to placate fat female readers, weakly supported by cherry picked "evidence". Healthy has always been seen as more attractive than unhealthy, though there have always been desperate simps willing to settle for and pretend they like fat women because that's the best they can get.

Look at the dumb bitch trying to argue that corsets weren't about making women look less fat:
High Status is cultural. The genetic base is alpha male. "High Status" is an elaboration that varies in each culture. In particular, the signs that identify the high status individual vary by cultures.
 
The mods (except @Dregster) understand far better than you think what the situation of inceldom is. They see that if it comes to be defined by a single stupid stand of genetics-only idiocy, it will die, just like Nazism died.
Cr3KIzu.png


WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? INCELDOM IS SOMETHING ALL OF US (US INCELS ANYWAY) WANT TO END, NOT KEEP ALIVE THROUGH IDEOLOGY.

@gymletethnicel @iamsubhuman @Uggo Mongo This kike is trying to keep inceldom thriving through his schizo ideas, but I'm apparently the fucking glownigger here. JFL

They also understand that even having a majority of idiots like you (midwits in fact) on the forum is not altogether catastrophic, provided that there are a few dissenting voices. These dissenting, high effort, voices are what will maintain the attractivity of the forum, and of inceldom as a whole, in the long run. So, seethe all you like, while the grownups work to maintain the integrity of the Blackpill; the real Blackpill.
Your "dissenting voice" isn't here to generate healthy discussion. You're here to promulgate your insidious propaganda in the forum, so that the average lurker and user fails to understand what the black pill is and falsely believes the things you're shitting out.

@TheProphetMuscle and @Caesercel have expressed their approval of what I am saying in various ways. I think they understand the value of it.
I don't think @TheProphetMuscle gives too much of a fuck either way and @Caesercel is just a lefty who doesn't think race is real, so don't start sucking your own dick just yet. :lul:
 
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? INCELDOM IS SOMETHING ALL OF US (US INCELS ANYWAY) WANT TO END, NOT KEEP ALIVE THROUGH IDEOLOGY.

@gymletethnicel @iamsubhuman @Uggo Mongo This kike is trying to keep inceldom thriving through his schizo ideas, but I'm apparently the fucking glownigger here. JFL
What kind of stupid strawmaning is this? Of course I don't want to keep inceldom alive and you know it very well. What I want to keep alive, and prevent it from dying the death Nazism died, is the Blackpill of course. You really think you are going to fool anyone with this flimsy piece of misdirection, glowie?
 
High Status is cultural. The genetic base is alpha male. "High Status" is an elaboration that varies in each culture. In particular, the signs that identify the high status individual vary by cultures.
The visible signs of it vary from culture to culture but high status itself is something women are attracted to universally. This was the case since we lived in packs before we were human.

Women are evolved to learn the signs of high status specific to their culture. So if everyone was subservient to men with red ribbons tied to their ears for a woman's entire life, she would be more sexually attracted to men with red ribbons attached to their ears, by observing body language and vocal intonations for how men with red ribbons were treated.

The cultural differences are what clothes, cars, etc. represent high status. But even without any of those women can pickup on who is high status by observing how other men treat and respond to each other (Subtle body language and vocal cues).
 
The visible signs of it vary from culture to culture but high status itself is something women are attracted to universally. This was the case since we lived in packs before we were human.

Women are evolved to learn the signs of high status specific to their culture. So if everyone was subservient to men with red ribbons tied to their ears for a woman's entire life, she would be more sexually attracted to men with red ribbons attached to their ears, by observing body language and vocal intonations for how men with red ribbons were treated.

The cultural differences are what clothes, cars, etc. represent high status. But even without any of those women can pickup on who is high status by observing how other men treat and respond to each other (Subtle body language and vocal cues).
Absolutely.

And in our culture, male handsomeness has become synonymous with high status. That is why foids have become Chad-only.
 
What kind of stupid strawmaning is this? Of course I don't want to keep inceldom alive and you know it very well. What I want to keep alive, and prevent it from dying the death Nazism died, is the Blackpill of course. You really think you are going to fool anyone with this flimsy piece of misdirection, glowie?
It's your own words, Soros puppet.

And what the fuck do you think the "black pilled order of monks" accomplishes anyway? It "keeps inceldom alive" by continuously bringing in new incel members to keep the order going. Therefore, it's exactly as I said. You want inceldom to remain at large. You're not here to help anyone.

You've cornered yourself here, puppet. You have no real moves left.
 
It's your own words, Soros puppet.

And what the fuck do you think the "black pilled order of monks" accomplishes anyway? It "keeps inceldom alive" by continuously bringing in new incel members to keep the order going. Therefore, it's exactly as I said. You want inceldom to remain at large. You're not here to help anyone.

You've cornered yourself here, puppet. You have no real moves left.
You are pathetic. This is absolutely not what I said. You are twisting my words.

Naturally, it is very likely that inceldom will NOT disappear anytime soon, given the state of our culture. In order to resist that state of affair, we need a strong and accurate worldview; not a simplified drivel for wannabe edgy midwits.
 
@Caesercel
doesn't he dislike you?
There is nothing more cucked than being incel and not hating foids
Spoken like a true micropenis cucked subhuman fake tough guy. Stop the act. Nobody believes you
Hahaha, it’s not an act. I truly hate those foul beasts. I know someone like you would find it hard to believe.
It is a cope and a lie. You would act all nice an tender if you thought you had the slightest chance of ascending with a foid
Speak for yourself soyfaggot
 
You are pathetic. This is absolutely not what I said. You are twisting my words.

Naturally, it is very likely that inceldom will NOT disappear anytime soon, given the state of our culture. In order to resist that state of affair, we need a strong and accurate worldview; not a simplified drivel for wannabe edgy midwits.
Biology > Culture.

That's a basic fact of reality. The black pill, as it relates to inceldom (sexual attraction and the resultant male involuntary celibacy that follows), does not look at culture, because culture is not a factor. It looks at culturally agnostic facts about evolution and biology, like height, muscularity, frame, facial harmony and symmetry i.e., facial attractiveness.

The black pill gives you a fundamental level understanding, stripped precisely of all of the very baggage that you're desperately trying very hard to throw back on top of it.

Your efforts are in vain. You cannot deny reality and attribute these facts of human sexual attraction to culture.
 
What kind of stupid strawmaning is this? Of course I don't want to keep inceldom alive and you know it very well. What I want to keep alive, and prevent it from dying the death Nazism died, is the Blackpill of course. You really think you are going to fool anyone with this flimsy piece of misdirection, glowie?
im too lazy to type out a full reply but anyone who thinks genetics are everything is coping really hard, i made a thread about how it hurts more to get lifemogged by guys uglier and shorter than you than to be lifemogged by a chad but it just got ignored by most people on the forum and called bluepilled for posting it
 
Biology > Culture.
Nope. That is just incorrect. Humans have the capability to modify their behavior through cultural inculcation. Instincts are indeed genetic but culture profoundly modifies them. Otherwise no one could have started farming, let alone working in a factory. All these thing go against all our instincts and yet, here we are, living in a supercomplex civilization. Culture has a huge power over us.

The black pill, as it relates to inceldom (sexual attraction and the resultant male involuntary celibacy that follows), does not look at culture, because culture is not a factor.
That interpretation of the Blackpill is just wrong. See above.

It looks at culturally agnostic facts about evolution and biology
You are talking like a shrink. They too pretend that they are dealing with "culturally agnostic facts" but they are full of shit. Among humans, nothing is "culturally agnostic". Everything is tainted and transformed by culture.

Your efforts are in vain. You cannot deny reality and attribute these facts of human sexual attraction to culture.
You are denying the reality of culture, which is massive and right in front of your nose. Indeed, we have genetic sexual instincts, but nowhere in the world, in no individual human being can you observe them free of cultural transformation. If you want to understand what is happening, you first have to understand what culture does and how it does it. It is the only way to disentangle it from the genetic underlying layer.

If you refuse to do that, if you just posit that you can observe "culturally agnostic facts", you are just denying reality. All you can come up with are trite nonsense that may seem appealing because they sound simple but will inevitably be gross distortions of what is actually going on.
 
im too lazy to type out a full reply but anyone who thinks genetics are everything is coping really hard, i made a thread about how it hurts more to get lifemogged by guys uglier and shorter than you than to be lifemogged by a chad but it just got ignored by most people on the forum and called bluepilled for posting it
Yes, I saw that thread. Good to see that there are some on this forum that are not prisoners of genetics-only mono-dimensional thinking
 
But anyway, please move OP's attack thread on me to the lounge. Why is it still there in ID?
It is in ID because it is about Blackpill substance. You are just the most prominent representative of what I am talking about.

Please mods, don't move it.

@Dregster, if you touch this thread, @Fat Link will kick your ass for good.
 
It is in ID because it is about Blackpill substance. You are just the most prominent representative of what I am talking about.

Please mods, don't move it.

@Dregster, if you touch this thread, @Fat Link will kick your ass for good.
No, it isn't, nigger. It's your personal attack thread against me. That crap belongs in the lounge.

@The Enforcer @SlayerSlayer @Dregster @proudweeb @Fat Link
 
No, it isn't, nigger. It's your personal attack thread against me. That crap belongs in the lounge.

@The Enforcer @SlayerSlayer @Dregster @proudweeb @Fat Link
Bring it back into ID. It is serious stuff. Substantial debate about the Blackpill!!
 

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
7
Views
215
Julaybib
Julaybib
Biowaste Removal
Replies
24
Views
767
Jotasso
Jotasso
RealSchizo
Replies
10
Views
340
SociallyStupid
S
drainercel
Replies
5
Views
216
Darth Aries
Darth Aries
highschoolcel
Replies
24
Views
284
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top