Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Why people no longer find existential meaning in labor and the rise of sexual-based identity politics

Atavistic Autist

Atavistic Autist

Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
Joined
May 28, 2018
Posts
9,335
In the early industrial era, working conditions were nothing short of traumatic, and because of widescale child labor, many people were exposed to them from a very early age. This brutality imposed a proletarian identity onto the masses, and politics were defined until very recent times by the struggle between the "productive" and the "unproductive."

Socialists defined the productive as working class people, and the unproductive as the parasitical, bloodsucking bourgeoisie who largely just profiteered off the labor of others (though not being without their own merits from a Marxist perspective).

On the other hand, capitalists did a dialectical magic trick and juxtaposed "productive plutocrats and aspirational, often debt-ridden, middle class hard working folks who are just temporarily embarrassed billionaires/millionaires" with "unproductive welfare leeches" (i.e., those workers employed at starvation wages by capitalist corporations and then subsidized by the state).


Now all of these fascinating political tendencies are receding into history, and it's mainly because labor in the West has become benign. At most, people consider their jobs a waste of time now, and not a matter of life or death.

But just as the economic marketplace has become relatively anodyne and nothing to really get worked up over -- an annoying "groundhog day" at worst where you'll always wake up the next morning -- the "sexual marketplace" has reached levels of dog-eat-dog competition and brutal deprivation and winner-take-all dynamics that parallel the economic conditions of early industrialism. It is not guaranteed that you'll wake up next to a sexual partner the next morning, despite all your best efforts today.


Women who get raped by psychopathic Chads become feminists in frustration, not unlike workers at risk of being laid off (heh) forming a union and organizing against their boss. They want to have their way with their boss/Chad, or else drive him away and get him in trouble. They will begin hating all capitalists/all men despite the fact that most "capitalists" as such are humble peddlers and small shop owners and farmers (sub8s) who aren't deleterious at all, and these will ironically be the most harmed by their efforts.

Sub8 men who get no women turn to radical political organizations, not unlike unemployed workers who have nothing to live for and nothing to lose. They are immiserated by the nature of their work/"self-improvement" and how hard they have to apply themselves just to get the bare minimum/make ends meet.

And then some sub8 men and feminist women embrace weird offshoots of radicalism which only serve to ultimately reinforce the status quo (some forms of "fascism" and transgenderism are analogues here, as well as "anarcho-communism" and fat positive feminism).

It is over.
 
Last edited:
Too many long words for me
 
Too many long words for me

Too many long words for me to care.

And I'm geneticaly modified

228602856 a6f72ae3d0 b
 
the economic marketplace has become relatively anodyne and nothing to really get worked up over
While I agree with your conclusions, I disagree about the reasons why the world is the way it is today. See, labor didn't become anodyne or just repetitive and boring, "nothing to get worked up over". It's actually just as hellish today as it ever was. It's alienating, inflicts an overwhelming sense of pointlessness, you don't see the results of your labor and you don't feel connected or rewarded by it, all while you have to dedicate at least ~9 hours of your day without considering overtime (if you include commute). The actual pay is bad for a vast majority, even the so-called middle class throws most of their money on mortgages and various payments/bills.

But while all of this has been happening in the labor market, the masses have managed to be distracted from this issue, brainwashed into accepting this slavery and taught to praise it and defend it as a freedom. One of the many tools used to distract are gender/sex/identity politics. But these are just a small part of the grand arsenal that makes this prison so insidious, where most of the prisoners are too distracted to even know they are in prison, or too apathetic and numb to do anything about it, not that that would be possible.
 
In the early industrial era, working conditions were nothing short of traumatic, and because of widescale child labor, many people were exposed to them from a very early age. This brutality imposed a proletarian identity onto the masses, and politics were defined until very recent times by the struggle between the "productive" and the "unproductive."

Socialists defined the productive as working class people, and the unproductive as the parasitical, bloodsucking bourgeoisie who largely just profiteered off the labor of others (though not being without their own merits from a Marxist perspective).

On the other hand, capitalists did a dialectical magic trick and juxtaposed "productive plutocrats and aspirational, often debt-ridden, middle class hard working folks who are just temporarily embarrassed billionaires/millionaires" with "unproductive welfare leeches" (i.e., those workers employed at starvation wages by capitalist corporations and then subsidized by the state).


Now all of these fascinating political tendencies are receding into history, and it's mainly because labor in the West has become benign. At most, people consider their jobs a waste of time now, and not a matter of life or death.

But just as the economic marketplace has become relatively anodyne and nothing to really get worked up over -- an annoying "groundhog day" at worst where you'll always wake up the next morning -- the "sexual marketplace" has reached levels of dog-eat-dog competition and brutal deprivation and winner-take-all dynamics that parallel the economic conditions of early industrialism. It is not guaranteed that you'll wake up next to a sexual partner the next morning, despite all your best efforts today.


Women who get raped by psychopathic Chads become feminists in frustration, not unlike workers at risk of being laid off (heh) forming a union and organizing against their boss. They want to have their way with their boss/Chad, or else drive him away and get him in trouble. They will begin hating all capitalists/all men despite the fact that most "capitalists" as such are humble peddlers and small shop owners and farmers (sub8s) who aren't deleterious at all, and these will ironically be the most harmed by their efforts.

Sub8 men who get no women turn to radical political organizations, not unlike unemployed workers who have nothing to live for and nothing to lose. They are immiserated by the nature of their work/"self-improvement" and how hard they have to apply themselves just to get the bare minimum/make ends meet.

And then some sub8 men and feminist women embrace weird offshoots of radicalism which only serve to ultimately reinforce the status quo (some forms of "fascism" and transgenderism are analogues here, as well as "anarcho-communism" and fat positive feminism).

It is over.
It’s because wageslaving in the past = guaranteed wife to stay at home. However nowadays you don’t get shit
 
Working is just filler to pad out the time before you die
 
In the early industrial era, working conditions were nothing short of traumatic, and because of widescale child labor, many people were exposed to them from a very early age. This brutality imposed a proletarian identity onto the masses, and politics were defined until very recent times by the struggle between the "productive" and the "unproductive."

Socialists defined the productive as working class people, and the unproductive as the parasitical, bloodsucking bourgeoisie who largely just profiteered off the labor of others (though not being without their own merits from a Marxist perspective).

On the other hand, capitalists did a dialectical magic trick and juxtaposed "productive plutocrats and aspirational, often debt-ridden, middle class hard working folks who are just temporarily embarrassed billionaires/millionaires" with "unproductive welfare leeches" (i.e., those workers employed at starvation wages by capitalist corporations and then subsidized by the state).


Now all of these fascinating political tendencies are receding into history, and it's mainly because labor in the West has become benign. At most, people consider their jobs a waste of time now, and not a matter of life or death.

But just as the economic marketplace has become relatively anodyne and nothing to really get worked up over -- an annoying "groundhog day" at worst where you'll always wake up the next morning -- the "sexual marketplace" has reached levels of dog-eat-dog competition and brutal deprivation and winner-take-all dynamics that parallel the economic conditions of early industrialism. It is not guaranteed that you'll wake up next to a sexual partner the next morning, despite all your best efforts today.


Women who get raped by psychopathic Chads become feminists in frustration, not unlike workers at risk of being laid off (heh) forming a union and organizing against their boss. They want to have their way with their boss/Chad, or else drive him away and get him in trouble. They will begin hating all capitalists/all men despite the fact that most "capitalists" as such are humble peddlers and small shop owners and farmers (sub8s) who aren't deleterious at all, and these will ironically be the most harmed by their efforts.

Sub8 men who get no women turn to radical political organizations, not unlike unemployed workers who have nothing to live for and nothing to lose. They are immiserated by the nature of their work/"self-improvement" and how hard they have to apply themselves just to get the bare minimum/make ends meet.

And then some sub8 men and feminist women embrace weird offshoots of radicalism which only serve to ultimately reinforce the status quo (some forms of "fascism" and transgenderism are analogues here, as well as "anarcho-communism" and fat positive feminism).

It is over.
This guy has giga iq
Linkage of preindustrial socioeconomic plight of proletariat with incels and sub 8 law is genius level and works on many many levels
 
And then some sub8 men and feminist women embrace weird offshoots of radicalism which only serve to ultimately reinforce the status quo (some forms of "fascism" and transgenderism are analogues here, as well as "anarcho-communism" and fat positive feminism).
They actually just infiltrated the old-school movements (anarcho-communism) and twisted their message. You can't say a revolutionary theory in itself ultimately reinforce the status quo.
 
Last edited:
Read every word
 

Similar threads

MuddyBuddy
Replies
2
Views
188
Friezacel
Friezacel
SlayerSlayer
Replies
29
Views
679
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
RealSchizo
Replies
4
Views
152
Grodd
Grodd

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top