Debunking the racepill.
[Blackpill] Racepill Part 3 (ethnics, enter at your own risk)
Let’s analyze this thread made by 13k.
Alright so he’s basically using okcupid data. Let’s delve in and analyze POSSIBLE racial statistics of male users. I couldn’t find a single source giving me the actual racial demographics in dating apps, so I’m gonna make a prediction.
There are 60.7% non Hispanic whites in the United States.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217
Since male and female proportions are relatively 50/50, we could also say that around 60% of males are white.
According to another website, around 40 million Americans use dating apps (
https://www.eharmony.com/online-dating-statistics/) 52.4% being white, meaning there are 21 million male users. If we were to apply similar racial demographic patterns to the race of these male users, we would get 12.6 million whites, 8.4 million ethnics.
Commonly, Chad and nonchad proportions play out in an 80/20 rule. This means that there are 2.52 million white chads, and 1.68 million ethnic chads using online dating. The Jordanian 13k highlights how most women messaged and were expected to message white men mostly, but he only blames it on race. This could be easily explained via the looks theory. There are 840,000 more Chads among whites. Thus, their hypergamous instincts could have been turned on by this simple fact.
Oh, and I know what you’re gonna say.
“Hurt durr but since ethnics have it worse they’re most likely to be using dating apps! So your proportions are completely false!”
Well, this could be easily rebutted by the simple fact that a lot of male dating app users ARE NOT failures in receiving sex. The fact that you find a lot of white Chads whenever you make a female account proves this.
Let’s delve deeper.
He talks about education and says: “White men and women with a college degree, are more likely to respond to white daters without a college degree than to black daters who have a degree.”
What does education have to do in dating anyways? It’s more about LOOKS, which matter the most. Education doesn’t always guarantee status. Since there are more Chads among the white population than the ethnic population, looks theory completely explain their behavior.
He also says this: “When attracted to other groups, only some daters are welcomed to cross the borders. In this sense, racial boundaries function similarly to one-way turnstile gates. While non-black daters, particularly white men, are well received when they contact daters of other groups, black daters, particularly black women, are largely confined to a segregated dating market."
Do you know how many black men in the US out there according to the census, percentage wise? 13.4%
Multiply that by 21 million (assuming IRL racial demographics stand out to online dating as well), and you get 2.8 million. Multiply that by 20% to get how many black chads are there and you get 560,000. This isn’t comparable to the 2.5 million white chads using online dating. And black women STILL love you guys over the white chads.
Thus, this trend of non black women rejecting black men on online dating could be easily explained by looks theory, and looks theory alone.
13k will probably say “hurr durr but aren’t white people more likely to be chads just because of their race? Racepill proved!”
Again, source for this claim? The fact that there are barely any white chads proves that this claim might be bogus. If whites really were born to me more attractive then we would see a higher percentage of white chads (among whites) roaming around.
[Blackpill] Racepill Part 4 (bbc meme DEBUNKED)
“Whites more than Blacks and women more than men stated a preference for a partner of their own race/ethnicity. Black males were least selective in the sense that the majority of them stated no preference in regard to the race/ethnicity of a potential partner. White females, half of whom sought a partner of their own race/ethnicity, were the most selective of the four Race/Gender groups.”
You know why their decisions showed that they have a preference? Again, it has to do with looks theory and I explained it above. Women are hypergamous creatures. 2.5 million white chads vs 560,000 black chads.
Obviously, the women preferred white men the most for a reason.
“The most striking feature of the table is the difference between the behavior of the White and the Black users. An overwhelming majority (85% for females and males combined) of the contacts initiated by Whites were to Whites and a correspondingly small percent (3%) were to Blacks.”
The female decision could be explained by hypergamy. The male decision could be explained by the fact that many men in dating apps see it as shameful to go for a black woman. Again, this once again proves that many attractive people roam these dating apps, and not incels only. White incels wouldn’t have a problem in dating black women, but white chads/chadlites/high tier normies, who have been used to other races like Asian for example would not date black women. This might be due to the fact that they see them as masculine, and Asian girls and other races of women as feminine. However the female reason tends toward hypergamy mostly, not racial skin tone, since they are hypergamous creatures.
If the US became more black than white, then we could see different results among the white women, because there would be more black chads than white chads. Again, you can argue that chads are more likely to be found in the white species by race alone (although I can’t see how you can prove this) but there are external factors that make you a chad. Why do you think second generation black men in the US happen to be more attractive then African blacks for instance? Or second generation Asian men compared to short Chinese men in China? They become taller due to nutrition and more attractive. It doesn’t just have to do with race. Nutritional development and proper tongue posture could play a major part.
“Blacks were 10 times more likely to contact Whites than Whites were to contact Blacks.”
Again, in the case of men look at femininity. Race might play a factor in the case of men, but in women it’s mostly due to hypergamy and looks bias.
“There was, however, an inconsistency between stated and revealed preferences for women: Women who stated no preference in regard to race/ethnicity nevertheless revealed in their behavior a strong same-race/ethnicity preference.”
What women say =/= how women behave. It’s that simple. Look at how they say they want personality in a man, but their decision goes to looks.
[Blackpill] Racepill Part 5 - nature vs nurture
Tadaaa. Again, he is extremely cherry picking scenarios in this case in which women rate white male faces the most attractive.
There was another study that found that UK women actually rated black male faces in the most favorable way.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031703&type=printable
Maybe the scientists in your experiment had the white males to be actually more attractive? And the scientists in my experiment had the black male faces to be actually more attractive? If European genetics alone were truly favorable to most women then such inconsistency wouldn’t have been found.
[Blackpill] Racepill Part 7 - Does "one drop rule" apply to your SMV ?
The whole “adding white to ethnic means more sexual appeal” theory could be explained by reasons other than “muh more white blood.”
According to psychology today, “Eurasians may possess genetic advantages that lead to greater health and, as a result, enhanced attractiveness. That's according to a study, the first to find that hapa faces are rated as MORE BEAUTIFUL than EUROPEAN or Japanese faces. Researchers say the finding may extend to other racial mixes as well.”
So basically other studies are revealing that mixed men, due to a higher exotic factor, might be even rated HIGHER than FULL BLOODED white men themselves.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/200512/mixed-race-pretty-face
Exoticness is underrated.
Washington post found that “A new study presented to the Council on Contemporary Families and published today in the American Sociological Review suggests yes — online daters AREN’T always attracted to people who look like THEMSELVES. In some instances, multiracial daters are getting a lot of right swipes.”
“White women responded to white men and Asian-white men the most, followed by Hispanic-white men and black-white men.”
ASIAN WHITE MEN, nearly equal to white men, who are MORE LIKELY to be chads (based on racial demographics analysis).
It’s not over for ricecels as the ethnifags love to state.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...iracial/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.bf0f17cde731
[Blackpill] Racepill Part 8 - Racial Homophily in Western Europe / Ethnics in W.Europe are FINISHED
First of all, the Jordanian is now using surveys to prove his theories which is a big red flag when it comes to women, since they are more likely (especially the American women) to lie and appear “holy” in front of their conservative dads.
There could be reasons for their SURVEY answers that has to do with looks theory (as I explained). These first generation refugees from Europe might look primitive and malnutritioned, and extremely sub8. But again this doesn’t have to do with race, but mainly proportionality and external factors. There are barely any refugees compared to white men in Europe, so the chances of finding chads among the white population might be extremely higher, thus the female hypergamous tendencies would “shift” toward whites.
However, again, this dude is relying on SURVEYS for his evidence. Let’s see other surveys on YouTube where WESTERN women mostly admit to have NO problem in dating a non white man.
Doesn’t prove shit.
If JBW is so true in the West, then why does the average white male have to travel abroad to Asia to get laid?
If JBW is so true in the West, then why is the west (that is mostly white) FILLED with incels and desperate men? Do ethnics really have it harder? At least they can get an arranged marriage in their original nations. White men have to compete with white chads for the girls.
If JBW is so true in the West, then why was there a small trend in which RICH and “loyal” white women in the era of slavery and RACISM had sexual relations with LOW status black slaves?
http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/art...-antebellum-south-a-socio-historical-analysis
I rest my case. It’s all about PROPORTIONALITY. If there are more and more ethnics in the West who grow right, then the hypergamous tendencies of women might SHIFT toward ethnics, because there will be more ethnic Chads.
And on the comment that whites have it better in other nations, it simply has to do with status. They are WESTERN. The Asian foids want a western passport from them and seek status. Western Asian men themselves would do as good, if not better. Also why is prostitution so common in Thailand if JBW is so true, and western men would have an easy time to get free sex (according to
@13k and his peers).
Here is another thread that talks about a similar argument regarding proportionality.
https://incels.is/threads/jbw-why-your-stats-are-not-proving-it.59285/
