I don't think you get the point of how vague the rule is, and how arbitrarily the standard is being applied, again if I guy on this site says - "a girl looked at me and smiled, I think she possibly liked me" should he get a warning.
1. He doesn't know she likes him
2. She could have been looking at someone else behind him, daydreaming or even looking at him like he's a joke and emoted a "warm smile" to hide her disgust/laughter
If someone can state they
THINK something, and that is bannable, and there is no clear criteria, then anyone can be banned for any reason.
I actually hugged some girls in my class once............. when I was like 6 years old.
- "bannable offence bro, you aren't a 1/10 that would disgust little girls from hugging you so you aren't really incel"
I was a pretty bold kid unlike some of the guys on this site, I was mostly high inhib, quiet and shy, but at certain points I'd push myself to do things hoping something good would happen, I remember even confessing to a girl I liked her at the age of 4, I got rejected, I got the "were good friends" excuse, how many guys can say they got friendzoned before even hitting double digits in age. (she was asian, probably the impetus for my yellow fever)
TBH I don't think the mods actually believe the hyperbole I stated above, I think they are just using the vagueness of the rule as a "security feature" to purge the site of
undesirables (like myself), let me say again, I got
3 CONSECUTIVE 20% WARNINGS over a matter of days and my way of posting did not change in any way from how they were. They can't just outright ban "undesirables" because that would make the site look weak and "normie like" which ruins the reputation of the forum.
After I saw that shit (3 consecutive convenient 20% warnings in a row after months of never reaching even 40% warning level) I decided to stay away for a month, to let the "warning level" die down, because it seemed like the "its only for a few days" spiel was a bait, so I would return, begin posting as I did before, and now they could just permaban me with the illusion of "it was a fair ban, he consistently broke the rules".
If they just upped and permabanned me now after returning with an entire month of no posting it would make what they are doing obvious, they want to get rid of "extreme posters" who draw "bad attention" to the site.
I've noticed a distinct "culture change" among posting on this site, before there were all these serious, long and detailed posts, speaking about theories, what acts of violence one might commit if given the chance, etc. Now look at the site and tell me I'm lying, its mostly meme posts, a few personal stories here and there, and a bunch of "this guy is cucked" threads, especially from reddit about guys getting cheated on or in open relationships.