Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Is Rape really such a bad thing?

Lol idgaf about shit like that. I defend my points with reason.

If anything, if you care about normie opinions that much, I actually make the site look good.

How are your opinions good by normie standards
 
This is why people hate us. What used to happen before is not relevant now, we've evolved. Yes men would go around raping women, but they'd also fight and kill other men in the process. Saying rape isn't bad because that's how it used to be is like saying we should go back to times when men fought and killed each other for women. I guess some people here would think that that's the way it should be, what do I know.

Rape is great. Humans should start killing each other again.
 
Before the soyim piss their pants, hear me out on this one.

Rape in modern society is very different from what it originally was. The abhorrent and evil crime of rape was originally about defiling another man's woman thus cucking him and possibly impregnating his wife. Thus diminishing his rightful chance at a legitimate offspring. Consent(the base of modern concept of rape), doesn't come into the picture. Husbands in olden times never needed consent from their wife, sex was a duty to be fulfilled, for family and community. There were also conquerers wifing up conquered people's women. Still no consent.

We can easily see that throughout history, the women never actually chose who they're gonna fuck. Men competed and the winners got to take their pick.

Modern rape( the one based on lack of consent) is a recent feminist construct. According to that logic almost all sex, that got humanity to where it is now, the reason why we all exist, is rape. In fact certain radical feminist groups unironcally proclaim that all sex is rape, even when its consensual. They want women to abandon heterosexual partnership and procreate via sperm banks. More moderate feminists would say that earning consent by using the situations of a women is also rape. According to them, escorting, beta-buxxing, sugar-dady relationships are also rape where the rapist is forcing consent by using women in bad financial situation.

So I pose this question....Is rape, the way it is defined now, such a bad thing? It allowed men and women to procreate. Allowed humanity to grow and prosper instead of dying out. Allowed people to live fulfulling sexual lives and build families. Is it so bad that we don't want to give much concern to something fickle like "consent" and instead want redistribution of sexual opportunities among the masses?
Yes it is, rape is bad, consent is important
 
I don't condone pedo attraction just like I don't condone homo attraction.
i don't think you'll ever acknowledge the distinction between pedos and hebes. it's complete bullshit and is a denial of science
 
Whatev kiddie coomer
you think you're so fucking clever, ignoring science and tossing insults as a substitute

fucking normie minded troll
 
Ok toddler doddler
never heard that one before

that would be more appropriate for larson's forum though, i don't even get remotely close to toddlers in terms of how low my age of attraction can be. toddlers is like 3, 4? lowest for me is like 11-12ish
 
never heard that one before

that would be more appropriate for larson's forum though, i don't even get remotely close to toddlers in terms of how low my age of attraction can be. toddlers is like 3, 4? lowest for me is like 11-12ish
That's still pretty low man
 
That's still pretty low man
muh low

you're the same dude who thinks marrying off 14-15 year olds (as in finished puberty, not in the middle of it) to men in mid 20's up to early 30's is "creepy" because of the age difference. that's agecucking

@Mainländer
 
Rape is a bad thing in the classic era when the femoid had something (though very intangible) worth preserving.

In the modern era it is a fantasy word exchanged with giggles with the sororities. like, ''tee hee not sure if it was a borderline rape that happened last night with Chad''
 
muh low

you're the same dude who thinks marrying off 14-15 year olds (as in finished puberty, not in the middle of it) to men in mid 20's up to early 30's is "creepy" because of the age difference. that's agecucking

@Mainländer
Anyone who uses the word "creepy" to shame their fellow men in an unironical manner should get a heavy warning at least tbh.
 
Before the soyim piss their pants, hear me out on this one.

Rape in modern society is very different from what it originally was. The abhorrent and evil crime of rape was originally about defiling another man's woman thus cucking him and possibly impregnating his wife. Thus diminishing his rightful chance at a legitimate offspring. Consent(the base of modern concept of rape), doesn't come into the picture. Husbands in olden times never needed consent from their wife, sex was a duty to be fulfilled, for family and community. There were also conquerers wifing up conquered people's women. Still no consent.

We can easily see that throughout history, the women never actually chose who they're gonna fuck. Men competed and the winners got to take their pick.

Modern rape( the one based on lack of consent) is a recent feminist construct. According to that logic almost all sex, that got humanity to where it is now, the reason why we all exist, is rape. In fact certain radical feminist groups unironcally proclaim that all sex is rape, even when its consensual. They want women to abandon heterosexual partnership and procreate via sperm banks. More moderate feminists would say that earning consent by using the situations of a women is also rape. According to them, escorting, beta-buxxing, sugar-dady relationships are also rape where the rapist is forcing consent by using women in bad financial situation.

So I pose this question....Is rape, the way it is defined now, such a bad thing? It allowed men and women to procreate. Allowed humanity to grow and prosper instead of dying out. Allowed people to live fulfulling sexual lives and build families. Is it so bad that we don't want to give much concern to something fickle like "consent" and instead want redistribution of sexual opportunities among the masses?
World War II Nuclear Physicist IQ
 
"Forced penetration" implies violence.
I'm clearly talking about violence not including the forced penetration. Forced penetration is barely painful and becomes pleasurable for foids after the first couple of seconds. A slap to the face hurts more. Get your IQ checked it's probably low.
 
Last edited:
muh low

you're the same dude who thinks marrying off 14-15 year olds (as in finished puberty, not in the middle of it) to men in mid 20's up to early 30's is "creepy" because of the age difference. that's agecucking

@Mainländer

Kids just shouldn't be married at all, no exceptions.
 
Kids just shouldn't be married at all, no exceptions.
depends how you define "kids".

some would argue at age 15-16 a foid is an adult woman.

this "no exceptions" isn't an argument, it's a lack of an argument
 
Rape is great. Humans should start killing each other again.
Humans are already killing each other.
Rape is a bad thing in the classic era when the femoid had something (though very intangible) worth preserving.

In the modern era it is a fantasy word exchanged with giggles with the sororities. like, ''tee hee not sure if it was a borderline rape that happened last night with Chad''
Chad can't rape. Period. He can force himself on a foid and still get away with it. Rape only exists for normies and incel tier men
 
depends how you define "kids".

some would argue at age 15-16 a foid is an adult woman.

this "no exceptions" isn't an argument, it's a lack of an argument

Someone who hasn't reached legal adulthood shouldn't have the ability to make a decision as significant as marriage. The state shouldn't recognize it.

There, that was my argument all along.
 
Someone who hasn't reached legal adulthood shouldn't have the ability to make a decision as significant as marriage. The state shouldn't recognize it.

There, that was my argument all along.
lol, you do realize that we are talking about laws, where they can be rewritten?

as in, rewrite the law so where a foid who is 15 is considered an adult as well as the law where they can get married at an earlier age?
 
lol, you do realize that we are talking about laws, where they can be rewritten?

as in, rewrite the law so where a foid who is 15 is considered an adult as well as the law where they can get married at an earlier age?

Then I'd simply reply that 15-year-olds don't have sufficiently developed brains to handle all the responsibilities of legal adulthood.

It's the same reason why I don't think juveniles should ever be tried in adult courts, whatever the crime. I don't know why Americans love doing that. It's barbaric.
 
Then I'd simply reply that 15-year-olds don't have sufficiently developed brains to handle all the responsibilities of legal adulthood.
do you think foids ever have sufficient brains?

also, are you aware that in the usa RIGHT NOW it is legal for 16 year old girls to get married in certain states?
 
also, are you aware that in the usa RIGHT NOW it is legal for 16 year old girls to get married in certain states?

Yes, I am aware. And it is wrong.

It is also just as wrong for the U.S. to sentence 16-year-olds to life without parole. I think if you commit a crime as a juvenile or young adult, any crime -- you should be offered some realistic opportunity of release before the end of your natural life.
 
Yes, I am aware. And it is wrong.
well when is the best time for a foid to reproduc you think?

serious question, women having babies late 20's early 30's is unhealthy

imo starting late teens is the best time no?
 
well when is the best time for a foid to reproduc you think?

serious question, women having babies late 20's early 30's is unhealthy

imo starting late teens is the best time no?

It's not unhealthy to have kids in late 20s and early 30s. Late 30s is where the complications start to develop.

I'd say mid-20s is a good time. Teenagers typically don't have their financial lives sorted out, which honestly isn't great.
 
It's not unhealthy to have kids in late 20s and early 30s. Late 30s is where the complications start to develop.

I'd say mid-20s is a good time. Teenagers typically don't have their financial lives sorted out, which honestly isn't great.
what about men who are 25 marrying 17 year olds and supporting them financially.

@wereqryan
 
what about men who are 25 marrying 17 year olds and supporting them financially.

@wereqryan

I don't think the state should intervene in a relationship between a 25-year-old and a 17-year-old.

They should still wait a year to officially tie the knot, though. Like I said, not a legal adult.
 
I don't think the state should intervene in a relationship between a 25-year-old and a 17-year-old.

They should still wait a year to officially tie the knot, though. Like I said, not a legal adult.
is it okay for a 23 year old man to date a 16 year old and then marry at ages 25 and 18 respectively?
 

Similar threads

MuddyBuddy
Replies
2
Views
196
Friezacel
Friezacel
highschoolcel
Replies
19
Views
416
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah
edgelordcel
Replies
3
Views
248
foidrapist69
foidrapist69
Lifeisbullshit95
Replies
11
Views
448
Simba
Simba
Drinkcel
Replies
8
Views
291
blackpillscience
blackpillscience

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top