No it’s genetics and working on yourself, you maxx all your stats out and if it’s still over than it’s over, you should already be eating right and exercising if you’re not even doing that you don’t deserve to call yourself incel
The biggest reason we end up ugly is because of how we were raised when we were young
J
cope, a tall height will only get you a ran through landwhale with 800000 body counts with tattoos even if that hypothesis is true
J
@orzmund
dude. no. Your genes play roughly 80% of your looks. Tongue posture, diet and exercise can have their effects but even THOSE factors can be affected by genetics
J
LMAO, you just proved what i said, she looks like if she has down syndrome
J
absolutely not
- A Swedish study based on 124 skulls from the 500 years preceding the seventeenth century found that the medieval skulls had somewhat smaller teeth and brain cases but larger jaws and wider dental arches than those of a modern population. 4 Other trends that have been reported include a reduction in palatal width between the Romano-British period and the nineteenth century 5, 6 and reductions in bi-zygomatic and maxillary widths between the twelfth and nineteenth centuries. 7
Cope. She is billions of light years ahead of him in looks. Keep coping height halo makes everything else irrelevant
That can be simply explained by survival ship bias. Weaker people were surviving more because of improvement in medical facilities.
look at the timezone you are referring to. Hundreds of years of diet and lifestyle change compared to a change of lifestyle within one generation, unless your ancestors lived similar lives to you then you alone breaking the chain of habits isnt gonna do much
shes going to cheat or leave him if she hasnt already
J
n
nigga average life expenctines was like 50 years old back then
J
true
J
lol you are over exaggerating since shes white and you are a curry, shes legit a 1
Yes and better than in medieval period. It can all be explained by survival ship bias. Us sub 5s wouldn't even survive and reproduce in forests
shes average at BEST. nonetheless the big hobo dude better hope no htn slides in her dms for whatever reason
Environment can play a role in how you develop physically but not that much, will only determine about like 10%. everything else is genes
No one hates cumskin woman more than me. Maybe only @AsakuraHao does.
That guy is fat and blad and sub 2. If was even 5'9 instead of 6'6, he would be browsing this forum
J
maybe you are right since infanticide was being practiced by them at the time, but diet definently also plays a factor, or else explain the contrast between prehistoric neolithic farmers being very narrow faced on average in comparison to animal husbandry/hunters being much more robust jawed
Two greycel fags coping height halo
J
cope niggers, this thread already has 300 fucking replies, stop arguingshes average at BEST. nonetheless the big hobo dude better hope no htn slides in her dms for whatever reason
Not even one evidence of destruction or massacre in that time. India had already discovered iron metallurgy by 1800 BCE natively. If anything we would have been stronger.
We even drove off the Greeks that came here 2500 years ago. Those niggers would have been no match to us.
J
lol it was actually around 3th bce kek, if that was true than the entire cultural shift away from Dravidians would not had happened, smells like mass genocide and subjugation
coping with what? stop worshipping painfully average looking women, simps like you inflate womens looks and then fuck up other mens chances. FUCK YOU ITS BC OF YOU IM INCEL
That guy IS LITERALLY SUB 2 and only ascended because of his height halo.
What culture shift? Stop reading pommy marxist nonsense.
Retard you will never get $
Stop resorting to anamolies, we dont know the quality of their relationship, he could be sexless for weeks, she could be cheating and using him for resources. That chick is average at very best with fakeup on
If you were 6'6 you would have ascended for sure.
J
cant forget about the massive haplogroup and autosomal influx reaching towards the fringes of south indian aswell
Seen many such examples irl. Height halo is the most supreme among all the halos
Evidence for the basis it was a massacre like you claim
And also evidence of a cultural shift like you claim
J
it was not a one time massacre or genocide, it happened periodically/gradually over time and it was mostly men who were being suplanted, look up the haplogroup of r1a dominating north west regions
Such a periodic massacre like you are claiming must have some evidence right? Please provide it. Also that there was a cultural shift, evidence for that as well?
J
uuuh the vedic period? Sanskrit? and the indo european language??? this all happened subsequent to the influx of these people, this is not a coincidence, the same way how britionic culture and ydna were replaced by anglo saxon when they migrated, the same thing happened in india ,a gradual shift without a complete replacement through genocide and political domination
Our beliefs are molded from the experience in our life. You believe what you see then
J
r1a haplogroup table, search it up, you cant have ydna supplanted without males being systematically killed LOL
Yeah. But proof of killings and cultural shift. It was more like a cultural mix and churn. Some practices from Indus Valley Civilization are still present.
Calling it a "invasion" need more evidence.
J
i highly doubt it was a peaceful mixing process LOL, otherwise Sanskrit would have proto Dravidian words in it which it doesnt, also it doesnt explain the caste system, a invasion is never archeologically proven dude, but we do have hymms of the aryans going to war with the native dasyus, but theres also zero concrete evidence of the invasion of gaul by rome archeologically, so should we say it also never happened? ofc it did, through records we know and the fact the entire shift of cultures happened, the language was predominantly forged by romance, now modern french people speak gallo-romance language
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Show me some evidence, at least bread crumbs.
So called "caste" "system" is not race based but competence, occupation and status based.
Indic and Vedic idea of race is very different. It is believed that all of us are originated from Saptva Rishis.
There are more aspects adding up to it but in many cases it might've been significant
There is more similarity between Dravidian languages and Sanskrit and any other European languages.
Last edited:
Dravidian in itself is a Sanskrit word that is a geographical term for South. And never a racial or linguistic term.
Last edited:
There is middle easterns mixxing in Indian in regions of Kerala of Muslims and Christians that came here since 1800 years. This was 100% peaceful.
Jains and Buddhists went to many places and converted the kings and people there.
I showed you two examples of both DNA shift and cultural shift that happened peacefully in India. Why should I assume this wasn't the case then. Especially when the natives here already discovered iron metallurgy and would have been stronger
Source for that information in Sanskrit along with your translations
Also are you assuming that Indus Valley Civilization used to be filled with dravidian people and languages. LOL. Recent IVC DNA evidence showed the woman's DNA was of ancient iranian neotropic farmers.
You think IVC was filled with niggers like this or what?
View: https://twitter.com/Sapratha/status/1646426553751048195
Similar threads
Discussion
How can IT deny that looks matter?
- VictimofBpillReaper
- Inceldom Discussion
RuudVanNistelrooy
Users who are viewing this thread
