Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Why is this forum bluepilled on ephebophilia, hebephilia, and pedophilia?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 23682
  • Start date
A better question is why do you think an incel forum is the kind of place where you have to regurgitate about how much of a pedophile you are.

Its not named pedos.co, blackpill doesn't mention anything about wanting to have sex with kids. Why do you think we of all people share your obsession with sexualizing kids and wanting to fuck them
 
A better question is why do you think an incel forum is the kind of place where you have to regurgitate about how much of a pedophile you are.

Its not named pedos.co, blackpill doesn't mention anything about wanting to have sex with kids. Why do you think we of all people share your obsession with sexualizing kids and wanting to fuck them
@BummerDrummer one of them finally showed up

and thanks for proving my point, by refusing to acknowledge the difference between pedophilia and hebephilia

and this is an incel forum, but the forum is not limited to purely inceldom discussion. and by that i don't mean sexhavers are allowed, but i mean topics about the overall culture are allowed, and that includes male attraction to certain females.
 
Exactly this

This dude lives off amoeba IQ threads, eager for an ego boost for all the baited attention that he desires

The only "opposition" here is the scolding he's receiving from bored users who are tired of seeing another @Edmund_Kemper tier thread for the 1000th+ time on .co

If you actually look at the posts, no one even disagrees with this shit thread.

We all already know the answer to this thread and have an agreed upon consensus on the matter.
Frankly it was not even a thread wasting time over. Just another amoeba iq very hypothetical thought experiment which every incel would have answered the same way(funnily enough some didn't). Of course the main purpose was not to reach a consensus but push his idiotic loli agenda
 
@BummerDrummer one of them finally showed up

and thanks for proving my point, by refusing to acknowledge the difference between pedophilia and hebephilia

and this is an incel forum, but the forum is not limited to purely inceldom discussion. and by that i don't mean sexhavers are allowed, but i mean topics about the overall culture are allowed, and that includes male attraction to certain females.
That’s hardly opposition and he made the same point we all did. This is incels.co. Not female worshipping underage girls.co
 
That’s hardly opposition and he made the same point we all did. This is incels.co. Not female worshipping underage girls.co
the fact that incels aren't allowed to betabuxx young girls is part of why we're incel
 
male attraction to certain females.
Why don't you say it for what it is. Male attraction to kids. And lol @thinking I would care about calling me words like "agecuck". You are the pedophile here. Nobody needs to take lesson on cuckery from the likes of you, who promote teenlovepill, dickpill and other low iq bullshit.

And if anyone is looking for my opinion on the matter they can click on the link and read that thread.
 
the fact that incels aren't allowed to betabuxx young girls is part of why we're incel
Hardly. If age of consent was lowered right now you wouldn’t get a little 14 yr old to voluntarily fuck you. Anything past that isn’t strictly lowering the age of consent but also enforcing patriarchal households
 
Why don't you say it for what it is. Male attraction to kids. And lol @thinking I would care about calling me words like "agecuck". You are the pedophile here. Nobody needs to take lesson on cuckery from the likes of you, who promote teenlovepill, dickpill and other low iq bullshit.

And if anyone is looking for my opinion on the matter they can click on the link and read that thread.
nope, not pedophilia, you refuse to acknowledge scientific terms
Hardly. If age of consent was lowered right now you wouldn’t get a little 14 yr old to voluntarily fuck you. Anything past that isn’t strictly lowering the age of consent but also enforcing patriarchal households
idk man maybe i would. who know for sure girls don't like guys their own age
 
Lol. Imbecile giving a choice between 13 year old and 31 year old.

How about giving a choice between 12 and 17 year old? Huh?

What? Does that not help you?
 
Lol. Imbecile giving a choice between 13 year old and 31 year old.

How about giving a choice between 12 and 17 year old? Huh?

What? Does that not help you?
keep coping. the fact is more 31 year olds get married than 13 year olds, and that is why society is collapsing
So you can get girls to fuck you?
@FullTimeLoser
@Dregster666
@Colvin76
@hamlossus
i said maybe i could buddy boyo. idk for sure

and as it stands now i can't get any girls to fuck me
 
Last edited:
So you can get girls to fuck you? Fakecel out :chad: :banhammer:
@FullTimeLoser
@Dregster666
@Colvin76
@hamlossus
I mean, I've literally heard him brag about getting kisses and dates. He's bragged a lot but this probably isn't one of them
 
keep coping. the fact is more 31 year olds get married than 13 year olds, and that is why society is collapsing
Wow. Not even gonna attempt to counter this autism
 
Its not named pedos.co, blackpill doesn't mention anything about wanting to have sex with kids. Why do you think we of all people share your obsession with sexualizing kids and wanting to fuck them
according to your definition of "kids", it actually does.


1603428990960

According to an article from the scientific blackpill, it is normal for a man to want to exert control over his female partners

https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1601&context=fchd_facpub
"There should be strong selection on males to control females' reproduction through direct coercive control of females.... Evolutionary thinkers, whether informed by feminist ideas or not, are not surprised by one of the overwhelming facts of patriarchal cultures, namely that men ... seek to constrain and control the reproductive capacities of women.... Juvenilization decreases the threat some men may feel when confronted with women; many men are comfortable around women whom they can clearly dominate and are profoundly uncomfortable around women whom they cannot so clearly dominate. The hypothesis that femininity signals ability to be dominated through juvenilization is an alternative to, but not necessarily mutually exclusive of, other evolutionary hypotheses that posit that femininity signals, sometimes deceptively, reproductive value and fertility."
 
That’s hardly opposition and he made the same point we all did. This is incels.co. Not female worshipping underage girls.co
Talking about how the AoC is cucked isn't worshiping underage girls. If there was a law that put incels in jail for flirting with 25-30 year olds it wouldn't be "worshiping 25-30 year olds" if we talked about how dumb that law is, and how it lowers our chances at ascending.
Hardly. If age of consent was lowered right now you wouldn’t get a little 14 yr old to voluntarily fuck you. Anything past that isn’t strictly lowering the age of consent but also enforcing patriarchal households
You can at least fuck jb whores and watch jb porn if you can't find a wife.
 
according to your definition of "kids", it actually does.


View attachment 359606
According to an article from the scientific blackpill, it is normal for a man to want to exert control over his female partners

https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1601&context=fchd_facpub
I have debunked that chart long ago. Not gonna do the same again
 
Even if chads hog up all the jb's after the AoC is lowered, at least the smv of foids in their 30's will be the same as the smv as foids in their 50's today.
 
people fear what they cant understand, and few can understand objective truths
FBI and IT must really love you
not as much as i love cunny
jkjk
 
Have you read the scientific blackpill?

It seems whenever a teen love or JB thread appears, the term "pedo" is screeched. Even if it's not pedo tier.

here's an example:

why were so many people shrieking "pedo" when it wasn't even remotely pedo?

This forum claims to be "blackpilled", but I don't think it is. I think it's just a bunch of ugly normies who are bluepilled.
Can't we all agree on the fact that a child cannot give birth to a child ? If you can get pregnant you're no longer a kid.
And it starts as soon as ... (why would it get wet is it wasn't ready for pregnancy ? That would must such an enormous waste of energy and it wouldn't be good for survival and would have been wiped out by natural selection)
edit : should i make a thread about this ? [IT WILL TOUCH THIS] JFL:feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:
 
Last edited:
Even if chads hog up all the jb's after the AoC is lowered, at least the smv of foids in their 30's will be the same as the smv as foids in their 50's today.
Would probably be the only thing of worth here tbh

Putting 30 yr old roasties in the same bin with 50 yr old roasties would be major lifefuel

Atleast all the hungrier more ambitious men would have an easier time scrapping anything older than 25 if they had the option to pillage 14-18 yr old holes without having banshees screech foul play in the dating market.
 
Theres no way changing AOC would change anything for us, be it 13 or 15 doesn't change the fact they screw around until early 30s when they get married. If you say removing age of consent would change your inceldom status, does that mean you think you have a fair chance with 11-13yo girls? I don't think so. Only thing that could affect incels would be forced child marriages because it would affect hypergamy. In the current state where women are liberated from moral and criminal judging AOC affects only sexhavers, more jb pussy for teen Chads.
 
so what fucking retard? if fucking JBs was legal do you think those foids are going to fuck you instead of chads or e-boys? Chads are already fucking them, lowering the AOC will make JBs even a more viable source of sex for chads and you would still get none. fucking retarded post, this is a sexhaver problem not an incel problem.

by the way, i prefer JBs instead of roasties.
 
I will support legalizing that. They are whores anyway. Jfl at thinking teen rosties are pure virgins that must be protected.
I do too. whats up with moralfags on this forum?? you have all the other internet for that. 13 girls are whores fucking chads over 18 if they can and if you do not see that you didnt went to school.

anyway we are sexually active too. we dont fuck other foids of that age and older cause they dont give us the chance. You all moralfags would have donne it if you were given the opprtunity you hypocrites.

lets no go over to the discussion of pedo. pedo is been atrackted to prepubescent girls. Quit watching american TV and swallow the biological pill.

now answering the @Personalityinkwell question. I would not marry any of the two, as I dont want to marry after all the bulliyng. not deniyng that I find myself much more atracted to 13yo than to 31yo of fucking course. no shit, youthness is beauty.

I think people here having a problem is they dont have the same age target than you and as they keep coping that teen girls are inocent children they repeat the pedo shit they hear on TV. I wish you do youre part and force those 'inocent children' you say to not behave and dress like fucking whores, but you dont do anything about it do you moralfags??
 
Until that happens, simply lowering the AoC will benefit incels because we're usually the ones who get punished for it anyway.
yup, chads dont get into problems never.

I could get a chance with a teen in my older years that I did not have when I was their age, and now the moralfag lwas are not goig to let me. What happens if i just get one shot in all my live?? would I not take it? of course I would, and then i would be in jail while the JB whores keep whoring around without consecuences.
hmmmm this thread is pure gold. Watch the "blackpilled edgy young guys" getting butthurted by your thread.

Edgy guy: "I wouldn't mind killing someone who interferes with my plans", "I really want to kill everyone" "I would kill all ethnics, they're scum", "Kill tall people", "I love to use people", "I'm so mean", "I did drugs in the past, I'm a BADASS".

Also Edgy guy: "NOOOO, DON'T TOUCH THEM! THEY'RE PURE ANGELINOSSSSS! SHE'S JUST 17, YOU'RE A MONSTER! wawawawa"

The irony is so great!

I will enjoy the show while it lasts.:feelsPop::feelsPop::feelsPop::feelsPop:

Good controversial thread personalityinkwell.
its time to grab popcorn and whatch. They say that he is spaming cause he makes a lots of posts about it. meanwhile I see hundreds of posts about curries are the only truecells and so on and nobody complains :feelshaha: :feelshaha:
 
Last edited:
Sa
you did not and you never addressed the follow up study
Saying this won't change that fact. When you bring out things like that you guys sound exactly like the flat earthers coming up with their little shit.

Most people are not pedophiles like you. Deal with it with dignity
 
It's the Nordic Model, expanded to wider society. 15 yo girls can be slutty, but if you look, you're a pedo. Just like women in Sweden can be prostitutes (offer sex) but if you try to pay for sex (buy sex), you are a criminal.

80% of men with a healthy ng/dL, during a societal apocalyptic collapse would pairbond with the nearest available 15 - 20yo, if laws and judgment were abandoned. I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying you can't exercise agency and NOT do that. I'm saying biology doesn't give a fuck about arbitrary AoC laws.

BTW I am not talking about raping a 5 yo todddler.
 
Sa

Saying this won't change that fact. When you bring out things like that you guys sound exactly like the flat earthers coming up with their little shit.

Most people are not pedophiles like you. Deal with it with dignity
nope, i'm not a pedophile, and no amount of screeching that word will make me one.

you're wrong, maybe you should deal with that with dignity
 
nope, i'm not a pedophile, and no amount of screeching that word will make me one.

you're wrong, maybe you should deal with that with dignity
Do you want to fuck kids? Yes. That makes you a pedo
 
I approve of this message, OP is correct.
 
Do you want to fuck kids? Yes. That makes you a pedo
16 year olds are "kids" and you approve of them, jfl

stop changing the definition, pedo is about prepubescent children, not your fucking bullshit
 
16 year olds are "kids" and you approve of them, jfl

stop changing the definition, pedo is about prepubescent children, not your fucking bullshit
Kids is about kids.

That you want to fuck. Don't try to dodge the fact that you are attracted to kiddy bodies
 
Have you read the scientific blackpill?

It seems whenever a teen love or JB thread appears, the term "pedo" is screeched. Even if it's not pedo tier.

here's an example:

why were so many people shrieking "pedo" when it wasn't even remotely pedo?

This forum claims to be "blackpilled", but I don't think it is. I think it's just a bunch of ugly normies who are bluepilled.
why do these threads always get made when I'm offline?
 
Kids is about kids.

That you want to fuck. Don't try to dodge the fact that you are attracted to kiddy bodies
nope, i don't wanna fuck prepubescents. I like chicks who have hit puberty and have tits and ass, signs she is ready to breed
 
nope, i don't wanna fuck prepubescents. I like chicks who have hit puberty and have tits and ass, signs she is ready to breed
The kids you want to fuck are hardly "ready to breed"
 
The kids you want to fuck are hardly "ready to breed"
those young women are not "prepubescent". and I disagree, they are definitely "ready to breed" @Made in Heaven can elab on this

why do you rely on the word "pedo" which refers to prepubescents? why not use the word hebe or ephebo?

it seems you are well aware of the negative connotations and need to use buzzwords for your argument.
 
those young women are not "prepubescent". and I disagree, they are definitely "ready to breed" @Made in Heaven can elab on this

why do you rely on the word "pedo" which refers to prepubescents? why not use the word hebe or ephebo?

it seems you are well aware of the negative connotations and need to use buzzwords for your argument.
I have already successfully countered made in heaven's points as well. You are walking a tight rope here trying to legitimize your pedophilia
 
If you can get pregnant you're no longer a kid.
This is more or less the case, though body size may also apply. My sister was like 5'4 when she was 11, basically the same size as my mom.
I have already successfully countered made in heaven's points as well. You are walking a tight rope here trying to legitimize your pedophilia
no you haven't. if a female is biologically ready, she's ready. it's not that complicated
1603458100801

MC melody at 13 years old

This is her at 11

528610d251c327d7d844a129285ccb15.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have already successfully countered made in heaven's points as well. You are walking a tight rope here trying to legitimize your pedophilia
nope, it' not pedophilia, no matter how many times you say it.
This is more or less the case, though body size may also apply. My sister was like 5'4 when she was 11, basically the same size as my mom.

no you haven't. if a female is biologically ready, she's ready. it's not that complicated
View attachment 359762
MC melody at 13 years old

This is her at 11

528610d251c327d7d844a129285ccb15.jpg
ready to breed. you can see her tits
 
nope, it' not pedophilia, no matter how many times you say it.

ready to breed. you can see her tits
I get an alert I happily open and. Aaaand instant disappointment. Just another autism from you about how you are not a pedo for wanting to pork 11 year old kids.
 
I get an alert I happily open and. Aaaand instant disappointment. Just another autism from you about how you are not a pedo for wanting to pork 11 year old kids.
autism? why can't you address the fact that pedophilia is about prepubescents?

why are you being autistic and avoidant? why can't you fucking address the definition?
 
[ @Caesercel won't touch this]

A child cannot give birth to a child. If you can get pregnant you're no longer a kid.

And it starts as soon as ...
(why would it get wet if it wasn't ready for pregnancy ? That would be such an enormous waste of energy which isn't good for survival and any foid with this dysfunction would have been wiped out by natural selection 200 000 years ago)
If not 10.3 years, you can safely say that 11, or 12 ,or 13, or 14, or as late as 15 aren't children anymore.

I'm seriously starting to wonder whether you are gay or not :feelshmm::feelshehe: Or do you better like milfs ? I won't be judging you, feel free to tell me. I can be some kind of psychologist for you if you wish.:)
 
Would probably be the only thing of worth here tbh

Putting 30 yr old roasties in the same bin with 50 yr old roasties would be major lifefuel

Atleast all the hungrier more ambitious men would have an easier time scrapping anything older than 25 if they had the option to pillage 14-18 yr old holes without having banshees screech foul play in the dating market.
I would be very happy to see 30+ year old rosties cry and scream that all the chads and rich betabuxxers are with jb's, then they'll be forced to sell their pussy to incels for bags of doritos.
I do too. whats up with moralfags on this forum?? you have all the other internet for that. 13 girls are whores fucking chads over 18 if they can and if you do not see that you didnt went to school.
Anyone trying to "protect" 13 year old rosties from getting fucked by nonchads is a cucked faggot who whiteknights for whores like the rest of the normies.
I think people here having a problem is they dont have the same age target than you and as they keep coping that teen girls are inocent children they repeat the pedo shit they hear on TV. I wish you do your part and force those 'inocent children' you say to not behave and dress like fucking whores, but you dont do anything about it do you moralfags??
The moral fags don't care if 13 year old whores get gang banged by ten 16 year old chads with 8 inch dicks, but will cry like bitches if a non chad downloaded a nude picture of a rostie under 18 or sent a dick pic to one.
In the current state where women are liberated from moral and criminal judging AOC affects only sexhavers, more jb pussy for teen Chads.
If you look at to catch a predator and the online "predator hunters", most the guys they "catch" are incel looking. Even though adult chads fuck most the jb's, incels are the ones who get in trouble just for chatting with them because of those cucked laws. Then the cucked cops and judges can inflate their stats and fool retarded normies into thinking they're putting "pedos" away after stealing their tax money.
 
Last edited:
13 y/o are already fucking chad doesn't matter if soyboys like it or not
 

Similar threads

TheMonk
Replies
109
Views
4K
Lonelyus
Lonelyus
B
Replies
8
Views
369
Puppeter
Puppeter
Logic55
Replies
14
Views
452
Epedaphic
Epedaphic

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top