Pinpoint
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2018
- Posts
- 5,451
The deeper a trait the more unfeignable it is. Women like the kind of traits that cannot be feigned. Whereas muscles are a very changeable/ malleable trait.
Women like to be a trip up for any frauders of (not dominarchal/ or successful person value). They snootily want the power concentration of those who have gotten ahead in life, and did not have any pain/fear driving them. But who are the
original/ tyrannarchal/ ahead of everyone else/ relying on instincts
women loan too much love/ trust to the archetype of natural ability.
Women love luxury flaunting in life. The kind of luxury people haven't the access to. There is more pedegree in having a kind of ornateness that isn't oriented on one steady motion like working out. Being effeminate has a halo to it. We live in the age of humanitarianism, insulation, and technology. Primitive/ brutish elements in society that sacrifice elegant dignified grace are passe.
Thing about sword forging. It is hard to get a sword to a certain kind of ornateness, but it is easy to just make a bigger sword. Women prefer beauty because delicateness is more difficult, and higher pedigree/ novelty than pure power and practicality.
Women want the hardest feat to achieve because they want tyrannopedigree.
Tyrannopedigree traits are what they love.
Demeanor of Pinnacle Tyrannopedigree.
To women, you seem like you have higher tyrannopedigree if you don't have to work out and you can just make it without muscles, but reflexes. Humanity prefers to be mobile in as many places as possible. Working out and being buff takes movement/ skill away from you.
This is just implicational. This is not actual. Women do not pick men purely (but partially) for real practical power, but for the sake of being affiliated with a fantasy. We live in the world where we don't really need new skills. Society is pursuing fantasy now. That is more needed in life in general.
Tyrannopedigree is highest when people are born in it. Inborn Tyrannopedigree/ IBTD is perhaps the most important thing women look for in primal hierarchy of sexual selection. They literlaly want anyone who produces value to be anxious and defeated by those ismply born with power.
Insecurity is feminine "" to women. But in practicality it is actually a great key to power. But it is not practicality they seek. It is pedigree/ fantasy, and that is, the pedigree of birth, or of tyrannopedigree, which is someone who dominates without a trace of a position of insecurity by being a gymcel.
Omnidomipedigree (where someone is almost omnidominant, to the point of them not having anything produced on them, and their reflexes/ ability/ offhand carry the day. For women, if a guy is self conscious it is almost feminine. But insecurity is a great force. But women see everything through the tyrannopedigree measurement system, where someone must be born with power completely, instead of having to have anything remotely produced.)
Exertion efficiency pedigree.
It's true. Women prefer the socially relative power that relies purely on birth-based traits. BBTs. The essentials alone. Relying on anything produced does not have the glamor of choosing someone birthworthy. On the novelarchy/ pedigreearchy/ etc.
There's nothing entirely glamorous about it. Having someone birth worthy is something women loan power to. Not the power of insecurity. Because women want/ relate their happiness in relation to the substance's remarkability to the competitive circles/ hierarchies out there.
There is a feeling of worthiness, magicalness/ ethereality when something comes out from nature, rather than from being produced.
There's a feeling of good life karma/ being chosen/ being loved by nature when you are good looking.
Women like to be a trip up for any frauders of (not dominarchal/ or successful person value). They snootily want the power concentration of those who have gotten ahead in life, and did not have any pain/fear driving them. But who are the
original/ tyrannarchal/ ahead of everyone else/ relying on instincts
women loan too much love/ trust to the archetype of natural ability.
Women love luxury flaunting in life. The kind of luxury people haven't the access to. There is more pedegree in having a kind of ornateness that isn't oriented on one steady motion like working out. Being effeminate has a halo to it. We live in the age of humanitarianism, insulation, and technology. Primitive/ brutish elements in society that sacrifice elegant dignified grace are passe.
Thing about sword forging. It is hard to get a sword to a certain kind of ornateness, but it is easy to just make a bigger sword. Women prefer beauty because delicateness is more difficult, and higher pedigree/ novelty than pure power and practicality.
Women want the hardest feat to achieve because they want tyrannopedigree.
Tyrannopedigree traits are what they love.
Demeanor of Pinnacle Tyrannopedigree.
To women, you seem like you have higher tyrannopedigree if you don't have to work out and you can just make it without muscles, but reflexes. Humanity prefers to be mobile in as many places as possible. Working out and being buff takes movement/ skill away from you.
This is just implicational. This is not actual. Women do not pick men purely (but partially) for real practical power, but for the sake of being affiliated with a fantasy. We live in the world where we don't really need new skills. Society is pursuing fantasy now. That is more needed in life in general.
Tyrannopedigree is highest when people are born in it. Inborn Tyrannopedigree/ IBTD is perhaps the most important thing women look for in primal hierarchy of sexual selection. They literlaly want anyone who produces value to be anxious and defeated by those ismply born with power.
Insecurity is feminine "" to women. But in practicality it is actually a great key to power. But it is not practicality they seek. It is pedigree/ fantasy, and that is, the pedigree of birth, or of tyrannopedigree, which is someone who dominates without a trace of a position of insecurity by being a gymcel.
Omnidomipedigree (where someone is almost omnidominant, to the point of them not having anything produced on them, and their reflexes/ ability/ offhand carry the day. For women, if a guy is self conscious it is almost feminine. But insecurity is a great force. But women see everything through the tyrannopedigree measurement system, where someone must be born with power completely, instead of having to have anything remotely produced.)
Exertion efficiency pedigree.
It's true. Women prefer the socially relative power that relies purely on birth-based traits. BBTs. The essentials alone. Relying on anything produced does not have the glamor of choosing someone birthworthy. On the novelarchy/ pedigreearchy/ etc.
There's nothing entirely glamorous about it. Having someone birth worthy is something women loan power to. Not the power of insecurity. Because women want/ relate their happiness in relation to the substance's remarkability to the competitive circles/ hierarchies out there.
There is a feeling of worthiness, magicalness/ ethereality when something comes out from nature, rather than from being produced.
There's a feeling of good life karma/ being chosen/ being loved by nature when you are good looking.