Then you have to apply this argument to every demographic that isn't on top. If you can recognize the systemic damage, it's not farfetched to say that it exists globally. If it exists in the places which are the most "free"...
Yes, correct.
Some numbers will show hispanics and native americans making less than blacks. No one rushes to indict them for it.
That's most probably because of the crime statistics of Natives to Blacks is comparably low.
Men as a group have always been the low-class laborers. Women make up the vast majority of consumer purchases. So even if we make more money, women are the ones spending it and taking most of the public benefits which we pour disproportionately into.
This is true, but it's not a supporting reason for the system privilege of Whites. Men of every race, religion, and ethnicity work to give their resources to their family. Their women, with whom they have children, are, by definition, family.
This fact of human sexual and social relations is not a systemic (institutional) privilege. This is simply how things are between men and women all around the world.
Systemic privileges in the West, like affirmative action, have obfuscated this natural fact of male-female dynamics and have mislead you into thinking that the dynamics between males and females are equal to the dynamics between different races, ethnicities, and cultures.
In the city of Pompeii, it was found that the men had darker skin than the women because they were working outside while the women stayed home. Men are the niggas of the world. Niggas are the men of the world. Even with that, women are quickly starting to out-earn men.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...-out-earning-young-men-in-several-u-s-cities/ They've already taken over higher learning institutions. Not because they're better, but because they're now able to take advantage of similar institutional benefits that whites have already been getting. I kind of touched on this in the affirmative action thread.
See note above.
The US is the most powerful country on the planet. Does this mean that US citizens are superior to non-US? Privilege and supremacy are not the same. The average white american is probably broke compared to the average indian or asian. Does this mean they are inferior?
Please define superior (and by negation inferior will also be defined), and note that superiority comes in more than one form. There is inborn superiority (physical and cognitive advantages), which is basically just genetics, and there is acquired or developed superiority, which is results-based merit.
To answer your question about the superiority of US citizens properly, we need to establish this term first.
"Class" as we think of it today is Eurocentric. Historically it has always been used to push a just world, capitalistic, racist narrative.
The first sentence is true, because Europeans introduced the concept (this is a historical fact). The second sentence is probably true. The claim needs support.
I don't think Bezos, Zuckerberg, Musk, or Gates are truly worthy or deserving of their position on the basis of them being "higher IQ" or somehow inherently better than anyone. Same for pretty much anyone who finds themselves in an overprivileged position. Micro or macro. This includes me. As a NEET of the US, I'm technically more privileged than the majority of people in this world. Not because I deserve it, but simply because I was born in the right place at the right time. Any personal competence on my part is secondary.
Nobody is ever deserving of anything, except what's morally and legally owed to them by their parents.
Everyone has to earn everything else. Everyone.
Has there ever been a "successful" European nation without the systematic plundering of other nations? (How Europe Underdeveloped Africa by Walter Rodney).
Yes, Finland.
I've already given the blueprint on why. This is also why "go back to Africa" is a dumb argument, as if the claws of caucuskikes aren't sunken in deep over there as well. Black people do not exist in a vacuum, so if we are going to be responsible, it can't be one-sided. Caucuskikes who couldn't survive on their own simply invented justifications such as "civilization" to plunder and pillage from other groups. Now the pot wants to call the kettle black when the shoe is on the other foot. They also used religion, creating "slave bibles" which omitted key passages.
Yes, "go back to Africa" is a retarded statement. What's your underlying point?
In America we already know about the various "black wall streets" that existed and surpassed plenty of white communities. In Africa and the Caribbean there are analogs to this. Of course the natural response of the cave demon to this is always envy and violence. Even now there are entire black towns buried under lakes and built over.
This is just your bias showing. Don't generalize this kind of uniquely American violence to the rest of the White race.
We have a globalized economy. Every nation is dependent on some other nation somewhere. Europeans are actually the best example of this because Europe has like the least resources, including human resources. White people do not shit natural resources out of their "godly" assholes. Even now they're trying to turn Uganda into a safe haven for gays and god help any African man who has the audacity to get in their way.
Can you please explain how this globohomo degeneracy in Uganda is an example of global systemic racism against Blacks that appeals to something other than "evil Whypipo?"
I think people overlook how strong the autoimmune response is to any African attempts to self-determine. Black leaders who threaten to galvanize blacks are persecuted or assassinated. There's a long list of them in and outside the US.
Can you please give examples and show these killings are cases of global systemic racism against Blacks and not due to any other factors?
It starting to seem that blaming Whites is becoming a convenient excuse for you to scapegoat us for every calamity that befalls Blacks anywhere in the world.
"I didn't get the job. Evil Whypipo."
"Bouncer kicked me out. Evil Whypipo."
"My wife divorced me. Evil Whypipo."
"Lightning struck my car and it won't start. God is depicted as white light. Evil Whypipo."
Another example is passport bros. You have a whole TikTok showing how white sexpats have been molesting children in these countries since time immemorial and engaging other degenerate activities. Yet traveling black men tired of american women's attitudes is enough to start a big fuss in various nations. And THEY are the ones accused of pedophilia and ran out of the country by feminists and cucks (Auston Holleman).
This racism is cultural, not systemic and institutional.
Even the likes of Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein...why are so many Middle Eastern countries still unstable? It must be that Arabs are bad people and violent terrorists. I mean that's what the white man told me!
No, it's because of American and European meddling. It's not a Whypipo thing at all. If it was, you wouldn't have Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell in their political appointments during the height of the War on Terror, or as you would probably rather frame it: Cumskins invading Sandniggeristan.
Same thing with reparations. People have relatively little to say about the other groups who received reparations, nothing to say about reverse reparations (France, Civil War). Black reparations is enough to get random people with little to no real attachment to the issue up in arms.
Reparations are one of the most reprehensible, immoral and illogical concepts that anyone has ever entertained in the history of civilization and culture.
If you commit a crime, nobody but you is responsible for it. Not your father, not your brother, not your child, not your descendents. It is morally repugnant and abhorrent to punish one for the crimes of another, and it is worse still to reward one as compensation for the crimes of another. You are infringing on the natural rights and freedoms of an innocent party, and this is always unjust. This is morally no different than a child being born and when they become of legal adult age to send them a bill for damages for the crimes that their father committed before he or she was born, or worse, having the police come and arrest them, a judge sentence them, and then have the jailers carry them to their cell.
You would say that this is completely preposterous and absurd, and you would be correct. Reparations are basically this, but with extra steps and multiple generations apart, instead of one generation.
Even South African white racists like Stephen Mitford Goodson (Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind) confess, they just blame the jews and bankers for it. Which I don't entirely disagree with. I just don't believe Europeans are guiltless. Various whites throughout history have sold out their people in favor of jewish moneylenders. Are they "responsible" for that? Or is it the big bad jew manipulating innocent whites (who just happened to be genocidal warhawks and robber barons)?
Yes, those Whites in history are responsible for that. They're responsible for all of the genocide, slavery, and war. They are guilty.
I, however, am not, and feel zero shame or guilt for something I did not do.
Do you go to fucking Mongolia and try to blame the average person on the street for all of the nightmarish terror that Genghis Khan - history's biggest terrorist - committed? No, because that would be absolutely fucking retarded and you would get knocked the fuck out and kicked out of the country for being such an arrogant cunt.
